this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
79 points (95.4% liked)

Linux

49521 readers
877 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Friend has an old laptop with windows 10 that he doesn't use because too slow and freezing all the time. Wants to revive it to leave at his lab in grad school for browsing the internet and editing stuff on google docs so he doesn't have to carry his newer laptop everyday.

I suggested Linux but I myself always used Debian and I am not sure it will run decently with such low specs. Was thinking maybe Debian 11 with xfce or something? Any better options?

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mint.

It's extremely stable Linux for your grandma, that comes with every tool that she will ever use and on the cinnamon interface all those tools are exactly where she will expect them to be if she is used to using Windows.

I've gotten three boomers to use it and they hardly ever ask for tech support because it's so stable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

honestly the distro doesn't matter so much as long as the hardware i supported. run a minimal desktop, disable CPU hogs and file indexing etc.

I used fvwm on Debian for many years on old computers. worked great. now I have kde/plasma on arch. my 10 year old laptop handles it fine...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

disable CPU hogs and file indexing etc.

Do you have some tips for that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Windows 10 has a bug with 100% disk utilization that goes away if you have an ssd. You should look into upgrading the ram to 4 or 8 gb. ddr3 ram is dirt cheap on ebay. It would probably cost $10-$15 for 8gb and another $10 for a 120gb ssd.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Debian is on the right track. XFCE might work - I remember it running pretty well on a laptop with 4 gigs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Raspberry Pi OS or antiX.

[–] adarza 2 points 1 day ago

for linux and the most basic of basic tasks, i'd look at peppermint. it's what i put on all the old crap here with 'marginal' specs that choke on windows. debian stable xfce based. base install is pretty sparse, not even a browser is included initially. a utility pops up after first boot to facilitate installing a browser, media player, and a few other things if you want them, or the entire debian stable repository is also available. one thing of note. with only 2gb ram, it's gonna be tight, whatever he runs on it.

his use case is screaming for a cheap chromebook, though. so at least consider that instead. an old laptop like that might make someone a nice little pihole or something, if it's not ready to be put down for good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Debian can be pretty light/small on a clean install and xfce should run fine on 2gb. Although the biggest thing is gonna be if the laptop has fast storage or not. Since its a celeron it might not be upgradeable, and if it doesnt already have an SSD any desktop will feel slow

Personally if I really wanted to squeeze all the performance I could for web browsing I'd go with minimal Debian and RiverWM but thats a bit more involved

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There are plenty of distros for very low end pcs, but they tend to require more tech skills to use. I have experience with a friend in a similar situation. I installed with mx linux for her and she is liking it. The performance is pretty reasonable and it comes with various tools that make it easier for people with less tech skills. The only extra thing I did was install the 32 bit version of firefox, because it makes a huge difference in low ram devices.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

If your friend is not tech savvy person, i would go with Mint XFCE (maybe Zorin OS Lite). Surely, it will be not as lightweight as Debian, but it will be much more user friendly for him

If he actually feel comfortable tinkering with OS - along side Debian maybe Bodhi Linux or antiX? I tried both of them on one of (in)famous Intel-based netbooks with 512mb RAM and they worked quite well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

With low specs like that, the experience will never be great, but with a very light desktop you can make it work. Debian is fine, but with some set up, Alpine could be one option. It's a really light distro.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I think Slitaz is still around, I always liked that for older machines, I was going to try it on an AMD C-50 laptop I pulled out of storage recently, except I don’t have time for messing around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is probably the best solution to the low memory problem, but it is also the least common and may be the most difficult.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There is a xfce live edition and a good wiki. Not having systemd is a great thing for these old specs in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

AntiX but sadly all it's desktops only support x11.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

AntiX or Alpine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Fedora.

It seems to be easy to manage and fast to install.

SUSE is slow to run and self-update.

Debian is far behind and Ubuntu seems to always have an issue during or right after installation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lubuntu has always been solid for me for low spec machines.

With only 2 gb of RAM it will be slow, there is almost no avoiding that part.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›