this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5927 readers
321 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Because SystemD

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Debian famously debated between Upstart and systemd before ultimately adopting systemd in 2014. Once Debian made its decision, other distributions that had been considering Upstart also shifted focus toward systemd.

Debian was probably the biggest contributor in why Upstart failed.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Because it was half-assed and from canonical.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

This article sucks and didn't actually explain why upstart failed.

Saying it failed because it was unpopular is idiotic. Why was it unpopular? What did other distro maintainers say about the canonical license? Why was Red Hat working on a separate solution instead of upstart? Why did upstart not provide additional features like systemd did? What made canonical pull the plug? There are so many questions and no answers to explain upstart's failure.