this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
486 points (94.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44978 readers
1120 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

The speed of 'push' is effectivly the speed of sound in a medium. So your shove would be the same as propagating a soundwave through whatever that rod is made of.

Veritassium covers this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPsG8td7C5k&t=61s

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Think of it like this. If our universe is a simulation, then the speed of light is the maximum speed at which information can propagate through reality. We know that for anything to move through space, it must move from one adjoining position to another, then another, then another, incrementally. Each one of those increments takes, at minimum, one 'tick' of the universe. That's one tick to increment each bit of information, that is, the position of something moving at light speed from position x,y,z to x+1,y,z. Light moves as fast as the universe allows; if there was a faster speed, light would be doing it, but it turns out that our universe's clock speed only supports speeds of up to 299,792,458 meters per second.

What you have here is sound. Motion propagates through material at the speed of sound in that material. That's part of the reason why moving large scale objects quickly gets weird.

Edit: to be clear, I am not making the case that we're in a simulation. I'm only trying to use computers to make it relatable.

[โ€“] ILikeBoobies 1 points 2 days ago

Move a sheet up and down rapidly

You can see the wave travel across it

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

This is actually a great example for why that stick must not exist.

You can also do this with a unbreakable stick and an unbreakable shorter tube. Throw the stick at a high velocity through the tube and it contracts for the point of view of the tube. Then close it shut. Now you have a stick that's longer than the tube fully contained in it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Because you put the apostrophe in the wrong place?

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Ok so since there's a bunch of science nerds on here and I'm sleep deprived I'm gonna ask my dumb ftl question.

If you're on a train and you walk towards the front of the train, your speed measured from outside of the train is the speed of the train (T) plus the speed of you walking (W).

So if there was a train inside of that train, and you walked inside of that, you'd go the speed of the outside train, plus the speed of the inside train, plus your own walking speed.

So what if we had a Russian nesting doll of trains, so that the inner most train was, from the outside, going as fast as light and you walked towards the front? Wouldn't you be going faster than light if you measured your speed from the outside?

Didn't come at me with how hard it would be to build a Russian nesting doll of super trains it's a hypothetical and I'm tired.

load more comments (13 replies)
[โ€“] jerkface 5 points 3 days ago

Putting it on the moon is just a distraction. It doesn't matter if the rod is 1m long or 100,000km.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

There's a bunch of these thought experiments that try to posit scenarios where C is violated.

Here's one I remember from uni involving scissors. Similar to what OP was thinking, but really really big scissors.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

At this scale, the stick isn't as solid as your intuition would lead you to believe. Instead, you have to start thinking about the force at the atomic scale. The atoms in your hand have an outer shell of electrons which you use to impart a force to the electrons in the outer atoms of the stick on your end. That force needs to be transferred atom to atom inside the stick, much like a Newton's Cradle. Importantly, this transfer is not instantaneous, each "bump" takes time to propagate down the stick and will do so slower than the speed of light in a vacuum. It's basically a shockwave traveling down the length of the stick. The end result is that the light will get to the person on the other end before the sequence of sub-atomic bumps has the chance to get there.

[โ€“] adaveinthelife 5 points 4 days ago

Go find a 30' stick and let us know if you can point it at the moon.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Nah, I prefer using quantum spookiness for that. Send a steady stream of entangled particles to the other person on the moon first. Any time you do something to the particles on Earth, the ones on the Moon are affected also. The catch is that this disentangles them, so you have only a few limited uses. This is why you want a constant stream of them being entangled.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You also cannot choose the spins of entangled particles, they collapse randomly in either direction when interacted with, meaning you cannot send messages. If you can figure out how to directly influence the spin of generated subatomic particles then BAM you have FTL communication.

But you would be amazed how many obstacles the universe throws in front of you when you try to break the speed of causality. Faster than light communication isn't possible because it makes no sense when you understand it. It's like "getting answers faster than questions." It's nonsense.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Wouldn't that still be normal light speed communication from earth to two places on the moon, not FTL communication between two places on the moon?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ