this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
1025 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

72894 readers
3660 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The same could be said about people who search for answers anywhere on the internet, or even the world, and don’t have some level of skepticism about their sources of information.

It’s more like, not having critical thinking skills perpetuates a lack of critical thinking skills.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (10 children)

How many phone numbers do you know off of the top of your head?

In the 90s, my mother could rattle off 20 or more.

But they're all in her phone now. Are luddites going to start abandoning phones because they're losing the ability to remember phone numbers? No, of course not.

Either way, these fancy prediction engines have better critical thinking skills than most of the flesh and bone people I meet every day to begin with. The world might actually be smarter on average if they didn't open their mouths.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Well no shit Sherlock.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It was already soooooo dead out there that I doubt they considered this systematic properly in the study...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Pretty shit “study”. If workers use AI for a task, obviously the results will be less diverse. That doesn’t mean their critical thinking skills deteriorated. It means they used a tool that produces a certain outcome. This doesn’t test their critical thinking at all.

“Another noteworthy finding of the study: users who had access to generative AI tools tended to produce “a less diverse set of outcomes for the same task” compared to those without. That passes the sniff test. If you’re using an AI tool to complete a task, you’re going to be limited to what that tool can generate based on its training data. These tools aren’t infinite idea machines, they can only work with what they have, so it checks out that their outputs would be more homogenous. Researchers wrote that this lack of diverse outcomes could be interpreted as a “deterioration of critical thinking” for workers.”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Misleading headline: No such thing as "AI". No such thing as people "relying" on it. No objective definition of "critical thinking skills". Just a bunch of meaningless buzzwords.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago

Unless you suffer from ADHD with object permanence issues, then in that case you can go fuck yourself.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›