this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
257 points (99.2% liked)

Europe

4136 readers
73 users here now

Europa

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why would anyone think storing any amount of a nations data or services in a foreign country was safe. No if you want that data/service to be safe and private, then no, that would never ever be a safe option.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can’t even begin to fathom why any country would do this OR rely on US military tech.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

i've been saying that about microsoft windows for about two decades and yet here we still are.

[–] corsicanguppy 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

OR rely on US military tech.

These are the leopards people invited in while they still had confidence USA was bumbling but not subvertible . Oh how the leopard turns.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Except the US hasn't been subverted in the slightest. This is just a distillation of the same old strategy with none of the subtlety.

The lack of information sovereignty is no surprise when you consider they lack regular ass sovereignty to start with. All these countries have US military bases in them with enough firepower to level everything important.

[–] corsicanguppy 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

storing any amount of a nations data or services in a foreign country was safe. No

One of my jobs brushes up against gov stuff. Private-possum, not secret-squirrel info. They're completely explaining it away like "yeah, we see how it feels ooky, but we had someone say it's all good, so we're putting all your PII into Azure" and that's almost the statement. It's like painting a stick of dynamite green and giving it to kids to play with.

We need to ask the data sovereignty question a LOT when suits are in front of microphones.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree that recent events have made it unsafe to host anything on a US company's cloud server.

But I disagree that recent events are the biggest reason not to host anything on Google, AWS, or Microsoft servers. You should have gotten away from them long ago.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

You should have gotten away from them long ago.

While I agree, open source technology hadn't yet fully matured when the NSA leaks first dropped. Something like Owncloud had only recently launched back then.

[–] corsicanguppy 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

hey.

Psst.

That antivirus software you and your gov installed on every machine out there, that scans every file when it's closed, to "ensure it's not carrying a virus." That one.

Who makes it? In America, you say?

No, not Defender; but let's talk about that too. Who makes the OS and crucial apps your local council uses? Muni, Region, Federal -- all Microsoft, Splunk, Solarwinds (even after they were super-pwned), Checkpoint, Office, Azure. All American? Really?

If we put TP-Link and RedFlag Linux and Kaspersky and Huawei on do-not-buy lists for privacy and espionage concerns, tell me how we're reacting to the risky new path of the US government and its Krasnov operative.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I don't think a lot of tech companies really thought through the impacts of Trump burning up America's international reputation.

It's hard to have an international presence when the international community hates your product and you no longer have leverage to negotiate.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It never was. Really. Never.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Putting the "government" on the cloud might be the single dumbest idea I have ever heard. Who thought that was a good idea?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.world/c/selfhosted for personal use

Hetzner and Akamai for production

[–] corsicanguppy 1 points 1 week ago

Do we hate OVH yet/still/again ?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The time to develop sovereign digital infrastructure was like a decade ago. Better late than never I guess. Good news is that the only way Europe can do this is by leveraging open source, so maybe we'll see more support for that going forward.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

massive step in the right direction. it was dumb all along to trust so much to the most murderous empire in existence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Thank goodness I just started moving my stuff to Nextcloud.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

As always, Bert is right. This has to stop.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Astronaut with gun.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

it never was..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Inertia, cheapness and laziness. Europe needs to develop its own IT infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not even that cheap. It's lock in, right? Cloud starts off cheap, gets expensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Cheap on the initial outlay for IT staff and systems. Pay for cloud instead and get locked in like you said.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Say someone uses a Droplet on Digital Ocean. What's the best EU alternative?

[–] corsicanguppy 3 points 1 week ago

Probably Hetzner. I'd still try for OVH as it's separate from CLOUD-act risk (by running its ovh.us as a distinct org, so avoid them but use the rest in relative safety) and it may be cheaper/better given your particular needs and tolerance.