Aerial battle bots!
Which ,bow that I think about it, could probably be done (or has been done?) these days with drones...
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
83 points (97.7% liked)
The Far Side
5942 readers
447 users here now
Hello fellow Far Side fans!
About this community and how I post the comic strip… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips and one of those was The Far Side. These days of course you find just about anything online including www.thefarside.com where they post several comics a day and I repost them here. Just to note, the date you see in my posts is not the initial release date, but the date they were posted on the website.
The Far Side is a single-panel comic created by Gary Larson and syndicated by Chronicle Features and then Universal Press Syndicate, which ran from December 31, 1979, to January 1, 1995 (when Larson retired as a cartoonist). Its surrealistic humor is often based on uncomfortable social situations, improbable events, an anthropomorphic view of the world, logical fallacies, impending bizarre disasters, (often twisted) references to proverbs, or the search for meaning in life… Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Far_Side
Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, cool stuff about the author, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s The Far Side!
Ps. Sub to all my comic strip communities:
Bello Bear [email protected] https://lemmy.world/c/bellobearofficial
Bloom County [email protected] https://lemm.ee/c/bloomcounty
Calvin and Hobbes [email protected] https://lemmy.world/c/calvinandhobbes
Cyanide and Happiness !cyanideandhappiness https://lemm.ee/c/cyanideandhappiness
Garfield [email protected] https://lemmy.world/c/garfield
The Far Side [email protected] https://lemmy.world/c/[email protected]
Fine print: All comics I post are freely available online. In no way am I claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
THE OCHO
What is this talking about? Cutting lines have been banned for decades already.
Banning something does not always fix the problem of its use. Per the article, there's a sizable sporting contingent with competitions being common. If there's money and fun in it, it doesn't go away just because the government says you can't do it anymore.
The article also mentions lots of local bans, and that the practice remains popular regardless. Motorcyclists still get cut by the lines, sometimes fatally, but there isn't any formal data collection to categorize the lines as a cause of death.
The article is talking about a local ban, pushing for it, and talking about other local bans.
It has been banned nationwide for decades. States do not have the authority to ban it. Cities do have authority, but the article isn't about cities and it would be redundant anyway.
So, overall, it's a political piece, pushing an entity that doesn't have the authority to ban the thing into banning something that has already been banned by a higher (on this case) authority for decades.
And yes, plenty of people still do it. Even outside of Rio (but it's way more common there). A serious article would talk a lot more about the police enforcing the ban, but then the author did notice that this just won't happen in Rio, for several practical reasons. So, why all the space pushing for something that is already there?
The point of the article seems to be for raising awareness I guess? I dunno I'm not from Brazil but I found it to be an interesting article.
imo it's perfectly fine to push for local action if federal-level bans have not been as effective as they need to be. While just writing the same piece of paper saying "you can't do this" by the city won't do anything, one can draw attention to the issue within the context of resource and enforcement allocation. I won't speak to the bigger picture as I have no idea what that looks like for Brazilian locales.
Edit: though I guess you're right that the article doesn't really address these facets of the issue. I think it doesn't properly go into ways the problem can be further addressed, including more proactive ones vs just ramping up enforcement.