An alternative sure, but not in the manner. StarLink is already filling up the air space and producing a ton of new space debris. It needs to die with an entirely different alternative.
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
1296 points (99.3% liked)
Buy European
2608 readers
4935 users here now
Overview:
The community to discuss buying European goods and services.
Related Communities:
Buy Local:
Buying and Selling:
Boycott:
Banner credits: BYTEAlliance
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
The alternative is putting up "do you want free training on operating a small bulldozer?" signs everywhere, hiring the humans who show up, and laying down underground cable or telephone poles everywhere. Fuck, just slap a "national defense" reason for why there needs to be internet everywhere for military communications.
Starlink outshines in latency vs undersea cables. Small drones use small radios, bigger drones can use bigger military satellites. Just build out communication to rural areas already. Integrate comm lines into road maintenance crews.
EU could knock them out of the sky.
What is the alternative?
Geostationary needs a lot more power to transmit.
What is the alternative?
Underground fiber. The thing we paid all our telecoms to install back in the 90s, which they promptly didn't do after pocketing all the money.
That's not even the issue with geostationary. The problem is latency to/from satellites in geostationary orbit.
Regime is working OT on weekend on dismantling our alliances.
Where IRIS 2 🦧
Now I do understand why nations started to name their '' air forces '', '' air and space forces ''
Soon, we may see satellites taken down Space at least until was a place of cooperation. Too bad we start to use it as a new field for combat
I am 100% willing to help start a 501(c )(3) with the goal of creating free access to satellite internet