Fediverse vs Disinformation

1055 readers

343 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.

Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

No disinformation
Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites

Matrix chat links

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

104

Measles Is Harmful, Contrary to Flimsy Social Media Claims of Long-Term Benefits - FactCheck.org (www.factcheck.org)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Measles is an extremely contagious vaccine-preventable disease that can lead to death or disability. It also wipes out immune memory for several years after an infection. As an outbreak in Texas continues to expand, social media posts have claimed without sufficient support that measles infections are beneficial later in life against cancer and other diseases, an idea health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has echoed.

[...]

Measles Harms the Immune System

“There is no good data to demonstrate that measles improved health,” Dr. Michael Mina, a former professor at Harvard School of Public Health who has studied measles and its effects on the immune system, told us. “We’ve shown precisely the opposite.”

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Christ, this sounds like an onion article.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I've two hypotheses for how this came about. People who contract measles don't live long enough to also come down with cancer. This lowers their representation during later years when cancer tends to form and get diagnosed. The other option is that people who actually survive measles do so because of either a naturally better immune system and overall health, or purposefully living a healthier and safer life due to the infection.