this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
748 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

22272 readers
2302 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 224 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tech guy invents the concept of giving instructions

[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With clear requirements and outcome expected

Why did no one think of this before

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Who does that? What if they do everything right and it doesn't work and then it turns out it's my fault?

[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It would be nice if it was possible to describe perfectly what a program is supposed to do.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a... code

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

We don't want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What, like some kind of design requirements?

Heresy!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Design requirements are too ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

That's why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I'm a systems analyst, or in agile terminology "a designer" as I'm responsible for "design artifacts"

Our designs are usually unambiguous

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think our man meant in terms of real-world situations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And NOT yet another front page written in ReactJS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, well, that's good, because I have a ton of people who work with Angular and not React.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This still isn't specific enough to specify exactly what the computer will do. There are an infinite number of python programs that could print Hello World in the terminal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I knew it, i should've asked for assembly

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah but that's a lot of writing. Much less effort to get the plagiarism machine to write it instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ha

None of us would have jobs

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I think the joke is that that is literally what coding, is.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Who even makes these comics? Is it like Simpsons

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Randall Munroe. You may know him from such gems as xkcd 3472 and 6548.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Getting a bit ahead of yourself, we're only on 3070 so far!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You have be more patient, those ones will take a while to load.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Web browsing 101: if you see a hyperlink on social media, you can click on it and then look around to see if it contains more links with useful information, often in the header or footer of the page. Here I found one for you: https://xkcd.com/about/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Human communication 101: sometimes humans ask a question without expecting an answer, it's called a rhetorical question

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Sorry, I assumed this was a place of discussion and conversation. You can either be helpful or don't, it's generally considered a dick move to taunt while being helpful.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

OP just chatting with themselves so they can screenshot it?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is some telegram group and both messages shows from left with profile icons(which got cropped). The screenshot person sent the last message which shows double ticks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

In the desktop client the positions of bubbles also depend on the width of the window.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Great attention to detail!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's just a fake conversation in general, look at the timestamps between the messages from the interlocutor. Several minutes to type a complete sentence?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Hey, i can take a few hours to reply sometimes :c

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I wrote a shell script like this (it admin , notna dev) for private use.
The prompt took me like 5 hours of rewriting the instructions.
Don't even know yet if it works (lol)

load more comments
view more: next ›