this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
573 points (94.1% liked)

Memes

47492 readers
2009 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Jokes on you. I'm a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of +- 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

I like this positive attitude!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, no- it's the design engineer who is clearly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Nah I blame the mathematicians

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

As long as it's perfectly 89° it's fine. That's acute angle.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

It's very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Barely acute 😳

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Engineers: Eh, close enough.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

shrugs Same order of magnitude

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

It's noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago

No. It's wrong, too. Have a nice day :)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

I saw this before and if I remember correctly, it's more like 87°.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. It measures about 87°.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Wrong on purpose

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

OP didn't make this

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

90° isn't any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.

So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It's supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Love it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Ahhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

I’ll see you in hell

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

It's still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Anybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

That's not right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I prefer the 91° version

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

After reading the title I internally thought: "fuck!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You monster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Not a whole circle? BASTARD!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You evil son of a witch.