this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Positive News

142 readers
41 users here now

This community is intended to diffuse the good things that happening in the news. Since we value social justice and environement, some contents are prohibited:

-Gratuitous aggressivity.

-Off-topic.

-Good news from a capitalistic or reactionary viewpoint (no "anti-woke", AI or crypto BS).

-News that are too anecdotical, like everyday kindness or common positive events.

-News which goodness depends of your personal tastes, like the victory of your favorite soccer team or the release of a movie you were waiting for.

-Disguised bad news.

-Fake news.

-Orphan crushing machines.

-Good news not yet concretized, like political promises, petitions, protests, denounciations (though some exceptions are tolerated, like political defeat of an explicitely shady politician or a protest carrying a particularly large amount of people).

-Scientific discoveries that does not improve health, social justice or environment.

founded 4 weeks ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The rules, originally introduced to decrease the risk of blood donations from groups with a higher chance of HIV exposure

Hasn't it been super easy to test for HIV for ages now? If they truly cared, they would just test for it, with an extra bonus being that anyone donating blood who don't know they have HIV can actually find out and get treatment. They already test donors for blood type to avoid having people misreport their types. This seems like more of a revisionist excuse to cover up the original homophobic reasons for the ban, i.e. preventing "pure, straight, god fearing Christians from being contaminated with demonic gay blood" or something.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Can't speak for every country, but having donated with the American Red Cross in the past, I know that they test every sample of blood for HIV.

Like the article mentions, there's still a restriction on donating if you have sex with new partners in the US, which I guess seems a bit redundant when they test for HIV anyways, but I can't claim to know how foolproof their internal mitigation models are at tracking and removing positive results. Swiss cheese rule might apply, who knows.