this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1017 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
4057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

For real, though, what is it?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago

A time of flight sensor for autofocus

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (5 children)

Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

Pro:

  • It's a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
  • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
  • 120 Hz display
  • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
  • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Slightly larger battery

Con:

  • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
  • Display has less resolution/PPI
  • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it's more efficient and modern)
  • Downgrade to USB 2
  • 600€

My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

If the 10hz reading implementation is good I may consider upgrading my fp4. A better camera would be nice too but if they get the power saving if that screen right then I'm interested...

Otherwise my fp4 has everything thing I need a phone to be

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Regarding resolution, I've been using my S21 Ultra at FHD quality (2400x1080) since I got it and it has a significantly large screen. I don't see a point in higher resolutions but I definitely appreciate higher refresh rates. Makes it feel smoother and more responsive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Worth noting buying a second hand phone is still better in every aspect and sadly 2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper. Though Fairphone is getting closer with each release!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] swagmoney 24 points 14 hours ago

headphone jackn't :(

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

Honestly, this might be the first fairphone which I would classify as good enough for daily use.

[–] dudesss 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

How well do these connect to Canadian cell phone towers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Ok but what about a headphone jack ?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

Fairphone is probably going to be my new phone when I upgrade.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›