this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2022
6 points (75.0% liked)

Lemmy

12823 readers
2 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In my opinion the only good thing it does is to create copies of already existing communities, so basically people tend to follow one community or the other and it divides the people who could be active.

If you want to create a community that's similar to one and for some reason you don't want to be a part of it, find another name, if you can't find another name, create your own instance. So if Lemmy is federating now we could have /c/worldnews, /c/world_news, and the same applies to every other instance that decides to do the same. In my opinion this only segregates people.

The same applies to uppercase letters, which Reddit uses but luckily Lemmy does not, imagine how many copies of a community could be created if you use both.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 years ago (1 children)

i say !WorldNews & !world_news should be (~symlinked to ?) the same !wordnews community unless exceptions (for different /c/...) permitted by administrators or upvoted somehow. With this, uppercase is no problem & readability would be nice.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Adding upper case letters to addresses would indeed increase what the "_" does, I don't think we should add them. Your method also requires manual intervention which is just not a good idea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago

"Manual intervention" would be necessary only for cases such as creating superb_owl ( while super_bowl exists ).
Mods could do it by themselves (without administrator) if they agree.
"Manual intervention" is what we do each time we comment ... i guess the ratio :
R~a/u~ = Manu.~admin~ /Manu.~user~
would be negligible. (?)

Thanks for your time, i rest my case 😌

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago (1 children)

It can be useful as a word seperator. If its a copy, instance admins can remove it if necessary. Also, it seems inconsistent to allow _ in community names, but not in usernames (if thats what you're suggesting).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

That precisely is one of the things I found it irrelevant for, what do you want to use a word separator for? It makes sense in names because there can be a million users, but with communities it's not the same, we don't need 5 communities with similar names.

Imagine this: /c/league_of_legends /c/leageof_legends /c/league_oflegends /c/leagueoflegends I just don't see the point and I don't think it makes it so much easier to read, since anyway most of the time you will be reading the display name, not the address.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

You can open an issue for this if you want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Sure, I'll open one if anyone (specially you and Dessalines) think it makes sense, so if you think it's worth continuing the discussion there I'll do it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

Personally I dont really think its worth the effort to make this change. But if you think it is, open an issue and maybe make a PR. In that case I dont have anything against merging it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I think I agree. Even just for simplicity's sake.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I'm not sure... I'm pretty sure sometimes and in some languages, separating two words can really change the meaning of a title, don't you think ?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Absurd example, but there is a city named "Chicken" (It actually exist !) A community about cooking chicken : eatin_chicken A community about places to eat in the city of Chicken : eat_in_chicken

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I mean... I think there are a couple of valid examples, I think it would make more sense to create a community named /c/chickencity and there you'd ask for places to eat, though. But let's say it's a valid example, in my opinion the pros are more than the cons. How many copies of communities can be created by adding the _ and how many communities will need to phrase their address in a different way because of it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I don't know tbh. You can make two copies of essentially the same community around the same interests/subjects with different names, underscore or no underscore. I think "mechanically" solving a problem like that is not a great idea, and that defining if two community should be merge fall into the hands of admins and administrators, not developers. If you are a mod of a community, or admin of an instance, chances are you know that such "clones" exist, and you either think you should merge and do it, or think you have a valid reason to stay apart and are free to do so.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Of course you can make similar copies, the thing is that with this issue people create them without realizing it and it super common, whereas having to find a similar name it's done on purpose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Actually I tend to agree with @[email protected]. Maybe the problem you are describing could be better solved by having admins review new communities.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago

Fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

super_bowl

superb__owl

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

You would have to ban more than just the hyphen, so might as well leave it as is

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

That's the only character allowed, so everything else is already banned. If you try to create a community it says "lowercase, underscores and no spaces".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

In that case, why not keep the only special character allowed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

In that case, why keep the only special character allowed?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

There must have been a reason – let's ask the person who decided this

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

The reasons were given, and personally I don't find it convincing enough, but your previous comment was not an argument, was just you saying "let's keep it because yes."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago

Let's keep it for readability then, no harm done

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago

I think the ones without a word separator should be gone, because it's harder to read