this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
958 points (96.8% liked)

Not The Onion

13185 readers
1061 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Berkeley Property Owners Association's fall mixer is called "Celebrating the End of the Eviction Moratorium."


A group of Berkeley, California landlords will hold a fun social mixer over cocktails to celebrate their newfound ability to kick people out of their homes for nonpayment of rent, as first reported by Berkeleyside.

The Berkeley Property Owner Association lists a fall mixer on its website on Tuesday, September 12, 530 PM PST. “We will celebrate the end of the Eviction Moratorium and talk about what's upcoming through the end of the year,” the invitation reads. The event advertises one free drink and “a lovely selection of appetizers,” and encourages attendees to “join us around the fire pits, under the heat lamps and stars, enjoying good food, drink, and friends.”

The venue will ironically be held at a space called “Freehouse”, according to its website. Attendees who want to join in can RSVP on their website for $20.

Berkeley’s eviction moratorium lasted from March 2020 to August 31, 2023, according to the city’s Rent Board, during which time tenants could not be legally removed from their homes for nonpayment of rent. Landlords could still evict tenants if they had “Good Cause” under city and state law, which includes health and safety violations. Landlords can still not collect back rent from March 2020 to April 2023 through an eviction lawsuit, according to the Rent Board.

Berkeleyside spoke to one landlord planning to attend the eviction moratorium party who was frustrated that they could not evict a tenant—except that they could evict the tenant, who was allegedly a danger to his roommates—but the landlord found the process of proving a health and safety violation too tedious and chose not to pursue it.

The Berkeley Property Owner Association is a landlord group that shares leadership with a lobbying group called the Berkeley Rental Housing Coalition which advocated against a law banning source of income discrimination against Section 8 tenants and other tenant protections.

The group insists on not being referred to as landlords, however, which they consider “slander.” According to the website, “We politely decline the label "landlord" with its pejorative connotations.” They also bravely denounce feudalism, an economic system which mostly ended 500 years ago, and say that the current system is quite fair to renters.

“Feudalism was an unfair system in which landlords owned and benefited, and tenant farmers worked and suffered. Our society is entirely different today, and the continued use of the legal term ‘landlord’ is slander against our members and all rental owners.” Instead, they prefer to be called “housing providers.”

While most cities’ eviction moratoria elapsed in 2021 and 2022, a handful of cities in California still barred evictions for non-payment into this year. Alameda County’s eviction moratorium expired in May, Oakland’s expired in July. San Francisco’s moratorium also elapsed at the end of August, but only covered tenants who lost income due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

In May, Berkeley’s City Council added $200,000 to the city’s Eviction Defense Funds, money which is paid directly to landlords to pay tenants’ rent arrears, but the city expected those funds to be tapped out by the end of June.


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 171 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Berkeleyside spoke to one landlord planning to attend the eviction moratorium party who was frustrated that they could not evict a tenant—except that they could evict the tenant, who was allegedly a danger to his roommates—but the landlord found the process of proving a health and safety violation too tedious and chose not to pursue it.

I feel like people should really read this part and fully absorb what it means.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not that surprising, courts require specific hard evidence. Getting the roommates present to testify may or may not be enough, but it's far more difficult than showing unpaid rent or a hoarding situation.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, boo hoo. A landlord actually having to do work. How awful, this is truly a tragedy of unspoken proportions

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been a landlord for almost 20 years. I've rebuilt some of these houses myself from an auctioned off unlivable disaster to a safe, clean, maintained property. To imply landlords don't work is such a narrow sighted view of reality. I got a glimpse during covid of an eviction moratorium a tenant that had quite a bit of hardship and I worked with her for 5 years pre-covid. Heating oil run out she couldn't afford I filled it out of pocket for her and her family. If she needed flexibility on rent timing I worked with her. When she snuck an untrained dog classified as an emotion support dog that chewed up the house's 70 year old woodwork stairs and balusters. I worked with her. When covid hit and the moratorium was about to go live her lease was up1 month prior. She ceased paying rent and utilities, I was informed I'd have to cover all her expenses during the moratorium. If she hadn't had that lease end right before this moratorium she would've continued staying there for free while I covered her family's entire housing and utilities. In the end my thanks for covering her and enforcing the lease end date was an entire house abandoned and full of trash and pest. Took my wife and I almost 2 months and close to $5000 to clean, repaint, repair/replace that property on top of the maintenance costs. This isn't a black and white situation..
Tldr, I guess: Evictions are a last resort for people who have had an agreement no longer be met by the other party. Should never have mad a moratorium on that legal process imo, it needed to have flexibility to help both parties not just shoulder 1 party with all the responsibility. The party is in extremely poor taste but I can understand their relief if they have similar tenants they can hopefully divest of after years of what my example held. I wouldn't have been able to do it for 3 years financially or mentally.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

The distinction is in the role of being the owner of the property versus the property manager and superintendent.

Landlords that also assume the role of property manager or superintendent for the land or buildings they lease do work.

But their role as owner and collector of rent is divorced from upkeep. The wealthier the landlord, the more removed and absentee they can be from their property. And the reality of that specific dynamic is just shining in the example of this kind of party.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

They like to use one case like this as their excuse to kick out a dozen people who are just trying to survive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 124 points 1 year ago (7 children)

“We prefer to be called ‘housing providers’”

I’ll call you extortionists. Take it or leave it.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago (7 children)

“We prefer to be called ‘housing providers’”

Landlords provide housing like scalpers provide concert tickets.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

extortionists

This only exists because almost every American city makes it illegal, or very difficult to build new housing. It's very hard to extort people when the a proper supply.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Sounds like people are in bed with the government to stop competition

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Completely unrelated question but where can I buy termites, and where can I buy a slingshot, and how many Gees can you subject a termite to without killing it?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming you mean "Gs" but I'm fascinated by what you have in mind for the last bit

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, they meant "Gees"

It's a good question, since termite gees may be different from bee gees.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but they wanted to know how many before the termites weren't stayin' alive anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A gee is Irish slang for vagina

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

We don't need context, we need answers!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

So, how many?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The party is overall shitty I agree with that. I also don’t think people should be able to own more than one home just to get rental income and have someone else pay their mortgage. This depletes the housing supply and takes away wealth building opportunities for families trying to build their own wealth.

That being said, this could have been handled better. If tenants could pause rent then the banks should have paused payments on mortgages that qualify as well, or just all mortgages.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My view is that unless you have a heartbeat you can't buy residential property. I'm not entirely against landlords because people want to rent, imagine having to buy everytime you went to a new city or place. But it should be diminishing returns from progressive tax policies that disincentivise multiple properties.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (36 children)

Yes landlords can be awful scumbags...

But am I supposed to think that people should be able to live rent free despite agreeing to pay rent? Not seeing anyone pointing this "minor" issue out here.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They prefer to be called "Housing Providers"

Parasites prefer to be called "Sharing friends"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

and I prefer to call them Guillotine entertainment providers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I... I thought this was satire...

You mean it's not?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Thought it was an onion article. Yup

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they prefer to be called “housing providers.”

no

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

It's like calling blackmailers "privacy providers".

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (28 children)

Landlords provide no benefit to society, outlaw them

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hey guys, we all hate landlords. A lot. The phrase that immediately comes to mind is "scum-sucking weasels." But let's not go overboard with the violent language, OK?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] masterofn001 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (28 children)

Coming soon: the end of the guillotine moratorium.

(This is happening worldwide.

In Canada the average rent ~~for a 1bdrm~~ is now over $2k

5 years ago I paid 800 for a 2 bdrm.

You're lucky to rent a room for that now.

That's why.)

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Kiosade 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Landlords are leeches on society. Play the stockmarket if you want to make money, don’t (continue to) make housing a source of gross profit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

Feudalism was an unfair system in which landlords owned and benefited, and tenant farmers worked and suffered. Our society is ~~entirely~~ not different today

There, fixed it

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Attendees who want to join in can RSVP on their website for $20.

That's a bargain for a bunch of agitators to come in and stir up trouble. I'm just saying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listen up everybody, they prefer being called "housing providers" instead of landlords now.

If I lived nearby I'd organize a bunch of people to buy tickets to their event and ruin it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

They're gathering a bunch of people who are destroying society in the same place, you say?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine a meteor landing on this party at peak attendance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

continued use of the legal term ‘landlord’ is slander against our members and all rental owners.” Instead, they prefer to be called “housing providers.”

I think I'll stick to "leeches"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

One free drink, but you gotta pay what a drink at the bar costs to get in lmao.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Kill your masters" T-shirts and bumper stickers are already a thing. I wonder how long it'll take to see similar stuff for landlords.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›