this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2021
32 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

35663 readers
233 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 years ago

information from it was used to prosecute 736 Post Office employees between 2000 and 2014

That's on average one prosecution per week.

I'm guessing, this is spread out across the whole UK, so maybe it appeared less, but still, how do you run so many prosecutions for several years without considering that it can't be the humans at fault?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

How were they losing millions, enough to make arrests and everything, and no one checked the books? Seems crazy to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

Where did the money really go, if these guys didn't steal it?

it happened because software was taken at its word.

By who? What is his punishment going to be?

the Post Office’s legal department was aware that the software could produce inaccurate results,

So it's not any software's fault. There was a conspiracy within the post office.