Opensource

5796 readers

128 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pylapp@programming.dev

The DCO Debate: Who Is Responsible for AI-Generated Code? (adventures.nodeland.dev)

submitted 5 days ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/opensource@programming.dev

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

AI-assisted development is already a reality, and the open source community is coming together to figure out how to manage it.

Many major projects and organizations now agree on a few key ideas: people must stay accountable, being open builds trust, and existing contribution rules like the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) still matter. The Linux kernel community, Red Hat’s legal team, and the OpenJS Foundation have all come to similar conclusions. AI can help with development, but people are still responsible for what they submit.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

The pwrson who prompted the AI programming tool. Unless AI just starts making random apps or something 🤔

[–] CreamyJalapenoSauce@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

Whoever commits it. If somebody traces a bug back to a commit with my name on it, they should come to me about it. I better have an answer whether I typed out the line or not.

What about codex and agents who author commits themselves? I don't have an answer. I don't use them that way myself. I wouldn't accept a PR that does.