As soon as the Scotland goal was disallowed, that was inevitable
this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Soccer (Closing)
157 readers
1 users here now
This community is being retired in favor of [email protected].
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just explaining why people are mad. Never a foul, offside is understandable but that's not what was communicated
Mate has this ref been payed off to make sure Spain qualify or something?
Seeing on telly now that a direct free kick was ruled out for offside?
For one of europes top teams spain are truly pathetic. cheating, diving and relying on ref favours to beat us. Should be ashamed of themselves.
Not sure why people keep saying this, it was announced as a disallowed goal for a foul and the on-field ref made the hand signal for foul.
This was not disallowed for offsides.
fucking robbery man
It was given for offside btw, not a foul
The VAR overlay said foul, the ref did the hand signal for 'foul' and not the raised flat palm for offside. Even if it's for offside, it is exceptionally soft.
load more comments
(3 replies)
CHEATING CUNTS.
Offside apparently.
Jesús Navas is eternal
You do if it's an interference because it's something that's subjective and it falls on the ref to say whether it is or not.
viva españa siempre 🇪🇦🇪🇦🇪🇦🇪🇦
That is interference clearly, he def made it harder to move for the gk and it's pretty obvious
Simon got a yellow for protesting
load more comments
(1 replies)
Navas is inmortal.
Corruption at its finest
He's on such a rich vein of form this season
From offside?
Jesus Navas's cross is really good, bet he practiced a lot with En-Nesyri lmao
Scotland had 0 shots the whole game and everyone is saying they were robbed 🤣🤣
load more comments
(2 replies)
the goal keeper could clearly move, that's why he clearly moved, just not in the right direction
Impeded the keeper by breathing? he barely did anything to impede him, Simon didn’t even claim for it
Common Morata W
It seems so, yes. I'm almost certain, though, that the ref didn't put his arm up to indicate offside, rather signalled a foul. All a bit confusing.
I did not see the offsides review, all I saw was the goal disallowed for a "foul" plastered all over the TV and the ref confirming it.
He has been doing this for literally 20 years on this level
I think it’s the interference with the play that is reviewable, the offside is clear for the VAR team, the question is : does the Scottish player do enough to interfere with the play? Up to debate I guess