this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10224 readers
327 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh wow it's almost like the FBI is filled with white nationalist and has been for a long ass time

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

And traitors to our country. But I guess I'm just repeating what you wrote when it comes to it.

Conservatism is a national security threat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I mean… in this case they’re going after a former president. Of course there’d be some hesitation. Even just to protect the symbol of the president.

But just like everything, Trump turned everything he touched to shit and now the office of the president is forever tainted because of it. It’s insane that we actually have to have a criminal probe into a president inciting terrorism in their own country

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guess what's the political orientation of the FBI then.. 🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

If they weren’t nazis, they wouldn’t be cops. They wouldn’t be allowed to be cops.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Enemies, foreign and domestic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

He's finally part of the "in" crowd. Notice that both Republicans and Democrats are pretty much eager to avoid looking at his crimes; instead both parties are just fundraising off of him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It’s funny that people think that cops stop being nazis just because they work for the federal government.

#ACAB

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

With trumps guy still in charge that isnt too surprising

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get an error when attempting to open this link, anyone else?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Cloudflare and archive.is apparently don't agree on how to implement DNS, so if you're using 1.1.1.1 (like myself) you'll get an error. This is the explanation I had seen elsewhere and I was like "Yep, that applies to me." (I assume it's happening with all variations of the archive site including archive.ph)

I found this^1 by searching around HackerNews, seems like a relatively decent overview of what is happening. Kinda paints the archive team in a not-so-great light, in respect to privacy considerations, in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ahh, interesting. I do indeed use 1.1.1.1, in part because of DNS-over-TLS that it supports. Thanks for the link.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is 1.1.1.1 like open source DNS? I used 8.8.8.8 (4.4.8.8?) for a long time when ISPs sometimes we're flaky, any pointers for what to use nowadays?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

8.8.8.8 is Google's DNS, which is not very privacy respecting of which sites you access. 1.1.1.1 is Cloudflare's and it is a lot more privacy-respecting while still being imperfect. However their track record in the privacy/security community is currently quite good, so it's up to you if those imperfections are a problem or not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It’s not open source, it’s DNS run by Cloudflare. It’s a privacy-oriented DNS service. You can read about it here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/announcing-1111/

load more comments
view more: next ›