Enjoy yourself. That's all. Also: Do the weirdest thing that feels right (article).
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
I really, really enjoyed that article. Thank you for sharing it.
That's a good advice. Thanks.
There is no meaning, and we must learn to be okay with that.
Fair enough, but finding meaning in life is not the same as finding purpose, no?
These are similar questions, and both depend on perspective. Both suffer from the fact no obvious/objective perspective exists to answer them.
The purpose of life is whatever you make it. Some people feel their purpose is to make as much money as they can, others to create art that will last for all time.
There is no one purpose to life. There's no cosmic point to it all, so we all just find out purpose.
For me, my purpose is to find happiness. I suffer from depression so that's my one goal. I find making people laugh makes me happy, so now I do a podcast where I make people laugh most of the time.
Do you mind sharing your podcast? I'm doing a lot better nowadays after beginning therapy but some days it's hard.
This is such a loaded question.
Many philosophers tried to answer it, some reaching an optimistic vision, while others concluding it was all doom and gloom (nihilists etc.). There are so many answers, because there are so many variables. To touch the point of the iceberg it depends for example if you believe in the existence of a prime cause (aka God and thus some kind of spiritual dimension) or not; and if yes, how you imagine its attitude (is it sentient? If yes, is it neutral, good or evil? How much does it interfere in the life of the universe? And so on and on...). That shapes how you start to analyze the purpose of human life and existence as a whole. So let's stick on the dilemma of being atheist or theist (avoiding the gray areas like being agnostic, because I'm trying to keep it super simple):
If you say no, there is no God, I believe in the chaotic order that is evolution: you may think for example that the purpose of life is hedonism, the pursuit of pleasure, because you live only once, in the now. And then you enter the rabbit hole of "what kind of hedonism?".
If you say yes and God is caring, the purpose of life is usually the betterment of your soul, to trascend the material dimension. There is an internal evolution here at play. And here the question then is how? You will have to pick which interpretation of the spiritual world convinces you more, a traditional religion or an esoteric philosophy (theosophy etc.).
If your God is neutral, then you probably have full agency, you choose what is you life purpose. You are free to make you own meaning, to play in this playground. The choices here become infinite like the stars.
If your God is evil, like the Gnostic Demiurge, your goal will be to rebel against the current system of oppression, escaping the prison it built to keep you in, for example reaching the true God or becoming your own God.
And, I stress it once more, this is only one of many variables.
In the end nobody knows. This is a personal quest with answers based on your personal intimate experience on what is life, what you currently value, what do you think is it worth living for and the type of relationship you have (or have not) built with its incorporeal, abstract, intuitive, invisible side. Fools are the ones that claim their answer is the only right one, because humanity in its current state does not possess the tools to prove or confute anything on this subject with undeniable evidence. If not fools, then they are manipulative bastards, that want to take advantage of your confusion and lack of direction to persuade you into pursuing a goal that does not benefit you, but them.
Leave it better than you found it!
The boy scouting rule ๐ช
Biologically: To keep your DNA existing by procrating so that roughly half of you DNA live on in your children (I say roughly half since there are mutations and stuff)
For Humanity: Develop technology, expand our presence by colonizing the solar system, the galaxy, and the universe.
Religiously: To serve whatever diety or dieties you believe in.
Philosophical:
-Hedonism: Do whatever to be happy.
-Nihilism: Nothing matters
-Probably many more under the umbrella of philosophy, but these 2 are the main ones I remember
That's all is on the top of my mind. For me, the biological view on meaning of life is kinda shit. I don't wanna deal with crying babies (eww... disguisting babies), I will never have children.
Now the idea that Humanity will expand and we will become interstellar, thats kinda what I think the meaning of life is, I mean that more of on the society level, not personal. Well then personally, its probably Hedonism. One person like me ain't gonna make any difference in humanity, I'll just do whatever makes me happy. Thats my meaning of life.
Nature centric: To shit and eventually die on the ground so to maintain the cycle of nutrients.
Species centric: To guarantee the survival of the human species by taking care or our young.
Personal centric: To grab the gift of life with 2 hands, to do what makes you happy and die with a feeling of satisfaction.
Disclaimer: Just some of my personal ideas.
To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women. Or cheese. I suppose either is good.
After spending way too much time and thoughts on it, I found peace in regarding it as a trick question.
There is no objective way to answer it. You may or may not find a subjective answer, or even several. It is both meaningless through ambiguity, and meaningful on a personal level. Because the way you answer it has everything to do with you. But there it stops. It won't lead to any insights beyond "I believe ...", "In my opinion, ...".
It doesn't matter, even if it makes any sense. Other questions, including related questions, are more meaningful and worthwhile, even useful. Examples:
- What do I want?
- How can I achieve it?
- What makes me feel good?
These aren't as shallow as they might seem at first glance, much as questions about life, the universe and everything aren't as deep as they seem at first glance.
Maybe it is one example of "garbage in, garbage out". A vague, ill defined question can use up lots of resources without providing any useful output. Similar questions with a clearer scope can lead to actual, tangible value.
Increasing entropy of the universe
(Or if optimistic, reducing local entropy)
Maybe to find and give love, promoting harmony and compassion amongst all beings?
The universe is a cruel, uncaring void. The key to being happy isn't a search for meaning. It's to just keep yourself busy with unimportant nonsense, and eventually, you'll be dead.
Sometimes reality can be scary. This is the only reason I can think of about the downvotes they gave you
Or because it was a low effort TV reference, in which case fair enough.
Whatever you make it out to be.
There is no universal purpose. Even the old "survival of your species" dogma is reaching the end of its usefulness, seeing how we've perverted our planet.
Reflect on your past. Cherish your present. Forge your future. This is what I think life's true purpose is.
To live.
save earth
To save earth from what? Climate change?
But then what was the purpose before climate change was a thing?
Climate change has always been a thing. The planet has been going thru hot/cold cycles for millions of years.
There is no purpose for any life on earth. The planet survived just fine before life started, it will survive just fine when life is gone. (or until Sol goes super-nova, or whatever it's called when it expands and engulfs all the planets).
Like everything else, you are part of something and made of other things. But for some reason, we seem to be aware enough of what is above and below, what is past and what seems to be coming. Why that should lead to suffering is a matter of managing expectations.
There is no purpose..
Yep, the purpose of life is to just live and there's no reason for that besides the fact that it just happened because laws of universe somehow managed to create autonomous complex mass of particles called living beings.
Edit: but because of how human psychology works we have an ability to give a "meaning" of life by ourselves and stick with it.