I use spotify more as a music discovery platform. If I really like an album i'll download the best version of it.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
37927 readers
498 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Same, Spotify is best for music discovery, once I find things I enjoy I buy an offline version and host it on my jellyfin instance
Meanwhile tidal already has better quality at the same price.
MQA is literal garbage, so no, Tidal doesn't.
Qobuz and Deezer do however.
What is MQA?
Tidal proprietary lossy codec, that they advertized as lossless.
It's been a long time since the MQA controversy but I remember this was a great video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRjsu9-Vznc
IIRC Tidal basically applies subjective post-processing onto the lossless files and pretends they sound better.
I wanted to like tidal, but song suggestions and the search didn't cut it for me after using it for 4 months. Other than that, quality is superb and very affordable!
Apple Music has already been offering Hi-Res lossless audio for years at no extra cost. They also don't pay tens of millions of dollars to anti-vaccine conspiracy theorists and shove them in my face.
I'm not sure what Spotify's plan is here, charging more for something that is the same or worse than what I already have.