this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

157 readers
1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of [email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It was a worse tackle than a couple of the others that have been given in the PL this year - no idea why that one commentator is surprised about it? Why are they arguing about if it's vindictive or not - it's obviously dangerous and lazy, even if not vindictive?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Really weird one. Didn’t really look intentional but his foot was so far wide for some reason and it was very reckless, that could have ended really badly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Another case of VAR interjecting to try and make a game more competitive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Defenders hate this one trick!

Just slide your foot under the defenders foot before it comes down for an easy red card.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Shielding the ball and an accident happens = a red? Sorry, shit happens sometimes, doesn't mean it's reckless. That's a stupid red and you can't justify it any other way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Very unlucky, but still a red card.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Apparently all you need to do is stick your leg under someone’s foot while they’re stepping to force a red card on the other team

Great precedent that will not be applied after today

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Remember when Shaw leg broken in half and Moreno walked out no foul and then scored after? That's reckless.

Rashford 100% just tried to shield the ball and Kobenhavn player literally put his foot under where Rashford landed his leg when he didn't see it. There was nothing reckless there, it's just very normal action with no malicious intent at all.I thought it's just a common sense.....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

surprised my the amount of ManU flairs agreeing with the (correct) red card also surprised by the amount of neutral flairs who believe that accidental ankle breakers have a free pass on the pitch

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Red seems a bit harsh but at the same time also correct somehow? Idk

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Warning: /r/soccer thread about Rashford. Studs on leg snapping stamp on player's shin, "twasnt never a foul that". Anything this guy does is excused.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Obviously Rashford doesn't intend to catch him like that, but he does, and I think red is the correct decision. Being unlucky does not mean the decision was unfair.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Was confused at first thought there was nothing in it but my god thats fucking awful to look at

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Is that really a red?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The officials are desperate for Copenhagen to win this match

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Ten hag is going to blame so many things in the presser

🤌🤌🤌

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Jones got sent off for a much lesser challenge. This is a career ender on another day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Clear red. This could've ended really nasty. Got some recent Marcelo red flashback.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Need to stamp out those, dangerously overly protecting the ball, so i'm not really complaining.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I dislike ManU but i absolutely despise red card decisions like these.

Everyone and their mother knows this was utterly unintentional.

Is this really what a red card should be about? Technicalities?

For me it should be the exact opposite: A red is when people deliberatly try to injure, or provoke injuries.

None of that happened here.

And this is comming from a guy liking Kopenhagen, Liverpool and City.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Personally I think red is a bit harsh here, yellow for sure, but that rashford is in possession and doesn't appear to see the other player I think saves him. Honestly though I could see it teetering red. Really unfortunate accident though, hence why I think rashford shouldn't have been given red.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Refs got zero ball knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It was the right decision he’s out of control and could’ve easily broke his leg

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

10hag bringing best out of Trashford

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I mean what do you want from the ref there

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, looks like we've got our clown car back on the road.

Definite red though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

If Romero was a Red, this is a red.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Unintentional and unlucky, but the correct call.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

There’s our weekly horrendous decision… his ankle is already planted, it’s not high. How?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

As a Man U hater, that's a red

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

This kind of red really harsh. Yes it was dangerous tackle, but one that was forced on Rashford rather than he had any say about it. Should be at most yellow. Footballers today cant focus on playing football anymore....

from Chelsea fan

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Intent doesnt matter. Its dangerous play even if its an accident. Clear red.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Idk.. He just tried making himself big and accidentally stepped on his leg. I know how it looks, but 0 intention and purely unlucky imo

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Fucking rubbish decision he’s not even looking at the player

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

By what fucking rule is that a red?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just looks like he's trying to shield that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

united actually needs to put out a statement

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Lads we can start party a bit earlier

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

ffs he tracked back once since the start of this season and he got a red card

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Zero intent nor an attempt at a tackle

Another VAR masterclass

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Just when we were having a good match ...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Honestly , one relaxed game is all i fucking ask for

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

He's shielding the ball man, fully accidental.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Did not expect that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

At most this is a yellow

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›