this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

33 readers
1 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The bears now have as many wins in 13 games using a backup QB as they do in 31 games when Fields starts. People keep talking about how bad the rest of the roster is (which is true) but it's crazy how other guys have somehow managed to get it done.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There’s a reason 31 other teams did not want him

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Flair checks out. I don’t really think using wins as a QB stat to knock Fields is needed. Just looking at his passing stats is good enough alone for that….

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Fields is what haters thought Lamar was

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Look at lamars mvp season. Fewer passing yards than that, and iirc, fewer rushing yards .

If not it's nearly identical as far as yardage.

And yeah, fields is definitely not without his faults. That's sack rate is an issue as is the fumbling.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

On the plus side, y’all are kind of set for the future.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes he was 0-7, but he wasn't all that bad this year compared to years prior

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Incoming mental gymnastics and Redditor cope for fields

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't really subscribe to QB wins unless it's over a 4 yr span or longer but damn..that's a shocking stat. Just wow.

I think they have their eyes on Caleb Williams and will trade Fields to the Falcons next summer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There is no span of time that it is a useful stat in a vacuum.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

difference maker

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You'd think fans of a franchise that shipped out a HOF QB for Jordan Love would have enough to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Feel like this is a bit of a stretch considering 3 of the wins you’re listing are by Andy Dalton who was named the starter in 2021. I wouldn’t count him as a true backup - he was legit better than Rookie Fields.

In 2022-2023, it would be 2-4 vs 4-17; still awful but doesn’t show that the backups are winning much more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's been remarkable how many great college qbs Ohio State churns out that end up being massive duds in the nfl, stroud not counting since he's a rookie

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So basically the same thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the whole Wilson vs Flacco/White narrative the last few years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This ‘argument’ is such a mouth breather take. If you think Bagent is better than Fields you should have your football watching privileges revoked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I feel really sorry for Justin Fields. I feel like the organization that coaching staff don’t know how to really utilize his strengths.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They should have went hard after Greg Roman tbh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Im not sure BAL would take him as a backup. Lamar looked better throwing to no receivers early on than Fields ever has.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

‘It works for Aaron Rodgers’ - Luke Getsy every offensive planning session

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

wins against:

1-1 Bengals (AFC Champions)

0-9-1 Lions

5-9 Seahawks

4-11 Giants

3-3 Raiders

1-7 Panthers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That was also peak QB sneak on your own 1 Giants to add some context

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Came here to make this point. Whereas Fields' wins, rare as they may be, came against a few teams who ended up with winning records. He probably would have won the 6 games his backup won. Maybe even one more.

Which is still awful.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao I know he doesn’t have the strongest supporting cast but it’s crazy how the narrative that every other QB would struggle to win anything on the Bears is still alive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even a lot of Bears fans back this. Oh, the Bears would have ruined Mahomes. That nonsense is such a slap in the face of great QBs. The fact is, the Bears have just been really bad at drafting QBs and haven't been aggressive in drafts with regard to the position. Before Trubisky and Fields, the most recent first round QB the Bears drafted was Rex Grossman in 2003.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You haters need to stop. Justin Fields just needs a little bit of help from the o-line and a coach that is going to make use of his talents and he will prove you all wrong.

2024 is the year of Fields for MVP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

a 31 game sample size versus a 13 game sample size? do they teach common sense anymore?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The day the bears find a franchise qb is the day I realize that I’m old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He always gets a medal for fucking up protection calls at the line because it makes people think his teammates suck even more than they already do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What if you swapped Justin Fields for Zach Wilson?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Justin Fields is a pretty good running back who lines up as QB.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wins are a QB stat btw

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Fields is likely a bust but honestly this is a coaching problem more than a QB problem. We clown the Bears for never having "the guy" at QB, but the coaches that have cycled through Halas Hall are basically all memes in their own right.

Owners need to go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like Fields is far from a bust. Statistically, he's become a mid-tier QB this season, and I think that's perfectly fine.

Half of the teams in the league would have an upgrade with him at QB and he's a clear #2 (behind only Trevor Lawrence) coming out the largest QB draft class in history. He doesn't need to be a locked-in top 5 to not be a "bust".

Last year we had 5 games in a row, averaging 30 points for that stretch, but went 1-4 because of the defense - yet he gets the blame, when he was the clear reason we were even in those games.

Obviously, I'm still in on him, and I feel like the horrible coaching and playcalling is playing a part in him not taking the gigantic leap many expected in the offseason. You see the same behavioral issues and habits (only worse) with Bagent, and it becomes clear that our entire QB room is suffering from the way they are coached.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This one honestly feels like coincidence

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m just sad at this point as a fan

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't get it that have the same amount of wins

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Opponent PPG for Fields:

2023: 31.4

2022: 25.2

2021: 25.1 (technically he was the backup)

In the last full NFL season, 25.1 would be good for 28th worst defense, 31.4 would be 4 points worse than the worst defense.

Opponent PPG for backups:

2023: 19.75

2022: 31 (one game, L)

2021: 22.2 (Dalton technically the starter)

In the last full NFL season, 22.2 would be good for the 18th worst defense. 19.75 would be 7th.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There’s more context to this than just the defense has been bad and is giving up 31 ppg this season. Fields is responsible for what, 3 touchdowns himself from turnover returns? What about the 3 and outs or his other turnovers too? Backups are usually asked to play a much safer game and try not to do too much. Which worked against the Raiders and barely worked last night. It does really help the defense though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As prognosticators have been telling us for the past couple of years, Fields as good if not better than Hurts. The data has been tallied up and he has a clear advantage....in losses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is there a world where the Bears stay at 1 and take Caleb?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

At this point I thought everybody just assumed that the Bears were taking Williams using the Panthers pick

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is there any precedent to a QB that runs so well (but wasn't a successful QB) transitioning to being a RB? Seems like if he doesn't stick in the league as a QB, he could excel as an RB and keep the defense guessing with gadget plays. And no, I haven't watched enough of Fields to be judging him as a QB, just asking a more general question if this has happened before.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The fans eagerly await the arrival of Caleb Williams thanks to the incompetence of the panthers management

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fields reminds me of Tebow

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Look at lamars mvp season. Fewer passing yards than that, and iirc, fewer rushing yards .

If not it's nearly identical as far as yardage.

And yeah, fields is definitely not without his faults. That's sack rate is an issue as is the fumbling.

Last 17 games 3100 passing 1200 rushing 35 total tds 12 ints and a lot of fumbles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

now do jordan love

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Trade him to a good team. It’s not Fields’ fault.

load more comments
view more: next ›