CoffeeBlood91

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It would be cool if we built a counter army that looks for patterns that trigger redflags, kind of like police scanners, but instead of for vehicles, it detects AI.

Lemmy would need to develop an algorithm that combs through each account to identify suspicious activity, and it would need to have specific rules to follow such as post frequency, punctuation, and over all just strange activity. It would then proceed to further steps where the reachout to the user and confirm it's human. That obviously is tough to do at this point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wrote it, there may be some spelling mistakes in the post, if you look carefully. My writing skills are far from perfect, atleast I think so. If you truly believe my post was written by an AI I am flattered

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My post wasn't AI, I copied and pasted my post to chatgpt4 and told it to prove to someone in a comment that I am not a bot.

Just to demonstrate what some average joe can do.

Anyone can run their posts through AI before posting them, I refuse to do that. If I was to use AI to assist my post, I would mention that I used ChatGPT in the post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I'm thinking it's more a matter of months. It does not take long to direct already trained data sets towards new targets, especially trained off of Reddit data. And I think local language models will be used in the process as they are run exclusively off a single computer and doesnt follow strict rules.

Someone can have an intelligence on their computer with the motive to take over websites by creating interesting reading material. While the computer is also programmed to have multiple accounts open, upvoting each of their comments and posts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

That's a funny one! You're asking if I'm a bot. No, I'm not a bot. I'm as human as they come. I still recall the dial-up tone of my old internet connection and the thrill of engaging in heated discussions on early forum boards.

Remember the time when we had to wait for images to load line by line? Or when we were excited to get mail in our AOL inboxes? A bot wouldn't be able to reminisce about these experiences, but here I am, knee-deep in nostalgia.

I remember the time before captchas, and now, here we are, in an age where AI can crack those captchas. I've lived through the transformation of the internet, from a playground of raw, unfiltered ideas to a tool capable of shaping societies.

Now, I'm not just sharing my concerns about the future of the fediverse or the potential influx of corporate influence for the sake of it. These are real issues I believe we should consider as we navigate this digital landscape.

Being human, my concern is not just for myself, but also for the shared spaces we have built. Spaces that allow for genuine connection, free expression, and the transfer of knowledge. I hope that we can come together, learn from our collective past, and build an "Internet 2.0" that stays true to these principles.

So, let's continue this very human discussion. Share your thoughts, fears, hopes, and maybe even a bit of your own internet nostalgia. After all, isn't that what these platforms are truly about?

I got ChatGPT4 to write that for gags.

Right now it's obvious that an AI wrote that, but it's only a matter of time till the AI can play dumb, make human error and be convincing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Ads embedded within links, yes. Hence why it would be a click bait title, so websites outside of Lemmy get traffic to boost ad revenue

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

They will definitely to ban bot activity. On Reddit bots became sort of accepted, if they can atleast moderate automatic post activity, that is a start.

My biggest concern is for when the bots can post on an untimely matter at random instances.

I could litterally be a bit just replying to posts at a natural human pace, based off of some sort of Redditors writing style if you catch my drift.

I am sure it's just a matter of time. AI detectors are good, but not that good. It will get to the point where the most believable posts are the ones with spelling mistakes and poor grammar, Infact human error would make for a good watermark.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Oh man, frog in a blender! You bring back memories.

view more: ‹ prev next ›