DPRK_Chopra

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For sure, no worries. I had the same questions as you when reading it. Fwiw, the paper is really kind of sloppy. I think it's maybe a case of poor students not wanting to pay for GPT-4? Maybe they'll clean it up and respond to some of the criticisms when it comes out of draft, but it doesn't seem like very rigorous scholarship to me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm talking about the models and how they're written about in the literature. I don't care how OpenAI brands their products.

From the paper itself:

For the additional 2000 SO questions, ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo API is used.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.02312.pdf

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

ChatGPT is 3.5, 4 is just called GPT4