Darrell_Winfield

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I love this reference. Great work!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Damn, bet nobody was expecting this reply!

I agree completely.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Interesting to see if it will be better than Bangle JS 2, the spiritual successor to Pebble. That's the one I've been using a few years and I still like it a lot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Looks like the one of the many copies of this you posted was removed, and that's the one I commented on. My original comment:

I read through most of the executive orders, and while I admittedly skimmed a lot, I didn't notice these kinds of things. Can we get some examples?

I read through the excerpt image you provided. Maybe I'm just not exposed to LLM generated text frequently, but I don't see how that's generative text.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I read through most of the executive orders, and while I admittedly skimmed a lot, I didn't notice these kinds of things. Can we get some examples?

[–] [email protected] 63 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Vertebral artery dissection. Very common chiropractic caused stroke. Vision changes are common in it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Beginning in 2024, the league expanded replay assist to add additional areas in which information could be provided when there was a penalty flag already on the field, including fouls for hits heading out of bounds, fouls for blows to the head of a quarterback

So what I'm getting from this is that the two most egregious calls that Mahomes got his usual gift for could have been overturned under current league rules? So why didn't replay assist chime in for either?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

While playing without them would probably hurt their chances, the most important indicator is whether the Chiefs' refs are healthy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I misread. I was reading it at Trump's people will attack regardless of the pardons that were issued.

Too coffee this morning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I specifically disagree with this being the reason for concern:

Trump's people will act without regard for law knowing he can issue preemptive pardons.

Maybe I'm just misreading the intent of that part.

Edit: yeah, I'm misreading. Sorry about that, folks.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I agree with the concern, but for different reason. This sets the standard for future presidencies. Imagine if Trump starts proactively pardoning people who might be political targets in the future. It removes the concern that your current actions might be determined to be in detriment in future considerations. Doesn't matter anymore, because as long as you do what the current president wants, he/she/they will simply provide you a future pardon to protect you from the consequences of your actions!

While I don't think Fauci did anything wrong or should be targeted, this is overall a very bad precedent to set.

Edit: I misread that last part, sorry. I do, however, think that this concern goes beyond Trump's presidency.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

Easier to trust and more accurate currently, but I don't doubt that the algorithm to generate the notes will be internal and closed source, allowing them to utilize that trust to manipulate people.

view more: next ›