And yet they would not turn out to nominate Bernie... Talk about lazy.
Hominine
My son caught me off guard asking me this question the other day. My first reply was The Stand, but there's a little book called Lying by Sam Harris that was pretty important to me.
Anyway, the reason I really replied was to say that many of John Grisham's books are kind of like candy, they just go down so quick. Fun reads by and large; The Partner is probably my favorite.
Wow, the echo-chamber vibes are strong on this one.
Then it is on you to engage with the replies to your comment instead of whinging into the void.
The only "territory" that deliberately manipulating a title comes with is that of misinformation. For what other reason would another application be wedged in? Why are other grants left out? It's all very plain.
Excellent read, thanks!
Someone spewing lies at a rapid clip does not impress me. Nor do I find someone taking their time to think through something disappointing. Unsurprisingly, we heard the same dog whistles about Obama pausing during his remarks.
Glad I steered clear of Proton, change my mind. No wait, don't.
So they're going to fuck up Mass Effect some more before being completely gutted? Cool.
Seems reasonable. Probably not that different to boot.
Mickey arriving to milk the cow meme.
Certainly not in numbers that got him nominated. And of course the DNC boogyman that is fronted here had nothing to do with that turn out whatsoever. The superdelegates didn't even matter his numbers were so low and she beat him by a factor of two in Texas. So much for the canard of progressiveness in red states.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html