LarsIsCool

I fully agree!

In person timed tests suffer from people under performing because of external circumstances. Also we should consider chatgpt as a tool that can be used like a calculator. If the answer to a test can be easily retrieved for a widely available tool, the test is only measuring performance that is no longer required. Where possible, ideally measuring performance is based on their skill during a larger time period regardless of the tools they might use. For example repeated in-person peer review sessions (without a specific time slot) could both improve once performance and generating evidence of performance over time while reducing effort from the staff

This will break posts where the author intends to format the title in large letters

Even then I think this might be a good solution. This prevents users abusing this to get attention. I don't see a legitimate reason the receiver would like some titles to be larger than others

I could do it in two clicks:

Click on this link https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.safetycore

Click uninstall

The only way to learn, is by playing

Out of interest, what are you missing?

Comment was from here (nov 2018): https://aroace-people-are-lgtbq.tumblr.com/post/180804138659/ah-yes-the-sexualities-straight-confused-i

So where is your battery percentage to judge?

Looking at the graph, it might be that it is inaccurate starting data combined with a slow decline

That makes sense. It seems that the house owners have since expanded with a little shed next to their house

Just wondering, how old is the picture?

!https://maps.app.goo.gl/1ZKG9RR7AYRg4j7j7!<