Laticauda

joined 2 years ago
[–] Laticauda 19 points 11 months ago

They're gone in a blink of the eye so why bother trying one, if you like it you'll only be disappointed when it's gone forever the next day.

[–] Laticauda 2 points 11 months ago

It depends on the process. Some processes literally make leather non-biodegradable. I'm not saying that faux leather is any better I'm just saying it's more complicated than people realise. The leather industry could certainly use some improvement.

[–] Laticauda 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

More proof that you don't understand how statistics work.

[–] Laticauda 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

You seem to be under the bizarre impression that gang violence kills different, more special and more numerous people. Statistics show that it doesn't kill more people per capita, it's just that more people in smaller areas will result in more deaths from various types of violence including both gang and domestic, because that's how numbers and statistics and population distributions work. Both gang violence and domestic violence kill people, who are historically, the same as other people and not some unique species who are somehow killed harder or more tragically than another killed person. It's not comparing apples to oranges, it's comparing apples to apples, except the farmer that grew one apple is wearing a different hat and lives in a different county.

[–] Laticauda 1 points 11 months ago

No I don't think people who use the word "digger" are specifically and purposefully altering the N word and directly referencing it.

[–] Laticauda 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sadly most people can't make enough money to survive doing that, because any job that let's you work from home WILL requires appointments and meetings even if they're just over zoom. And zoom appointments are about 500 hundred times worse for me shudder.

[–] Laticauda -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

By that logic any smaller predator that feeds on small animals is a "cat" and any large predator that feeds on larger animals and/or hunts in packs is a "dog" which is... Not at all how nature works. Foxes are canines that exhibit a lot of classic canine behaviour and very little cat behaviour in top of many behaviours unique to foxes, domestic cats are not actually solitary creatures just solitary hunters hence why they develop colonies, some wolf species are solitary hunters such as the maned wolf, birds of prey also fill the same ecological niche as cats, as do weasels, chimpanzees are also apex pack hunting mammals too but no one would ever say they're running "dog software", heck humans are the ultimate Apex pack hunting predator, does that mean wolves are just running "human software"? Lions and hyenas exhibit completely different behaviours and social structures from both domestic dogs and cats as well as each other, lions also aren't the only large cats that hunt in groups, cheetahs can as well when they form a coalition. It just seems like a dumb way to classify animals as if dogs and cats aren't extremely diverse and complex animals in their own right and instead every member has to be forced into these awkward and inaccurate "hardware vs software" stereotypes.

[–] Laticauda 8 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Unfortunately in real life that isn't an option.

[–] Laticauda 1 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I don't think you understand how statistics work.

[–] Laticauda 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I mean, if you can find a way to harness it, it sounds like the perfect way to banish enemies to the shadow realm.

[–] Laticauda 0 points 11 months ago

Mainly birds of prey I imagine.

[–] Laticauda 64 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Yes because this community definitely doesn't have a huge bias towards US culture.

view more: ‹ prev next ›