What do you mean by "run"? A gouvernment should fund universities and research institutes who conduct such experiments. I am not opposed to the government having a say in which lines of research to fund in priority depending on what their political project. For example some grant dedicated to energy sources more carbon friendly. But the government should not be more specific topic-wise or method-wise, and should instead rely on panels of experts for questions such as which line of research looks promising enough to put in more gov money.
Liwott
joined 3 years ago
Fediverse = youtube with ads interrupting your vids
The problem is that Peertube's catalogue is not at all comparable to YT's. I understand that a creator can attract their public to PT that way, but that's pretty much all
Sorry, just corrected the typo :) The question is : what is a fediverse analog to this Netflix example?
Why wouldn't they? What do they have to lose in such a federation? One may argue, as OP did, that they would want to spread their ideas to new publics, without being too afraid of losing their own.
Hence my question on whether they made any statement about not wanting to federate with leftist instances.
I get your point that their core ideology is nauseating and incompatible with any form of leftism. I'm also not saying anything along the lines of federating with them being any good.
I see thanks !
I see thanks !
Bakchodi.org [...] will never federate with leftist instances.
Can you link any such statement?
They often won’t defederate from you and get butthurt when you defederate from them.
This behaviour is well explained by their desire to fight for "absolute free speech", so it does not require the extra assumption that their intention is to gather attention.
On mastodon they’ll even do campaigns where they send suicide promoting dms with gore in them to lgbt people.
Even this one can be seen as overcompensating for the "pro-LGBT censure". While the ideology itself does not justify making these campaigns, it depicts censoring them as even worse.
Not saying they are right in any way, just that the core of the problem you describe is their ideology of absolute free speech, rather than it being misrepresented by attention-seeking individuals.
So while a communist could go to wolfballs and make posts, they won’t be moderated by staff but they will of course be in a sea of unpopularity due to the strong community bias shaped by both the site’s administration and community.
I am not sure I understand the difference with lemmy.ml. Do you have examples of people banned (edit : or post removed) because of their political alignment ? (I mean beyond the "no bigotry" rule)
that rings a bell, thanks !
2
MTV Entertainment Studios inks new and expansive deal with creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone through 2027
(www.southparkstudios.com)
view more: next ›
I am very eager for the day where the countries just lose their sovereignty within a true European nation. But before that, we need more democratic European institutions. National vetoes would be a problem if they were directed to decisions of the European people, but not so much to when they are directed to ones of the French or German government.