MudMan

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (17 children)

No, hey, I get it. You want a cool toy, not a boring practical solution. That's legitimate. I own many things that are not the optimal answer to a problem just because I like them.

The sheer rage at the insinuation that the option may not be optimal is fascinating, though. So uniquely American. Which is what this thread is about. "The maximal use case".

For the record, I had not heard of the "Honda Fit". I guess it's like a Japanese Fiat Punto. Also for the record, what both the Fiat Punto and the Honda Fit seem to have is a back seat. But hey, again, a cool toy, not an optimal solution. Maximal use case. It's a good observation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, it's not the lawsuit that would trigger it, it's the outcome of it. So yes.

Yes on the other things, too. I can't imagine they would be opposed to working with alternatives to provide Wayback Machine fallbacks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean... it depends on what you mean, I guess? Even if I hadn't spent the pandemic lockdowns comfortably holed up in a small apartment, it's worth noting that big-ass houses typically have yards while small apartments do not.

I guess if you mean "having shops, bars and restaurants within walking distance" that can maybe work, but otherwise that doesn't seem to track.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (4 children)

IA is quickly becoming a massive, risky single point of failure that is one bad lawsuit away from causing a major problem.

I want to hope they have an exit strategy, but I'm thinking we need to start providing alternatives. A single backup is no backup at all, and all that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Right, but in this scenario you end up with two vehicles: a light, economical car to drive and a dedicated work vehicle. The original point is that expensive, heavy vehicles as daily drivers can be less practical and economical than mutiple cheaper, dedicated vehicles.

For some reason, this makes Americans, and especially American car people VERY angry to hear, and it's bizarre.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (55 children)

AAAAAAH, it's happening again!

Let me speedrun through this: I've never seen a pickup truck and I am in a rural place where people move stinky stuff all the time. Vans can be purchased with sealed off cabins, and with all doors open can be hosed down easily. It's fine. Nobody here has pickups. I haven't seen a pickup or known anybody to have one and everybody is fine. This is a strictly American thing and the US isn't the moon, there really isn't a unique need to use a truck bed for school runs.

You're doing the thing the man said: drive a tank to buy groceries in case you have to haul manure once a year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hey, I'll give the guy some room until he's gotten some actual movies made.

But hey, hey, listen.

Sasha Calle Power Girl.

That's all I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Sorry, what's your counterargument here?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (16 children)

This is my unironic assumption of how flat earthers happened, honestly. Before the pandemic I'd have said antivaxers, too.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (65 children)

I had to use a unit converter, but I've lived in places housing up to seven people that weren't that big. Comfortably.

This is a conversation I had here recently as well when I pointed out to a car thread that for the money Americans pay for pickup trucks you can also buy a hatchback and a proper van, cover most use cases and not drive a tank to take kids to school. They did NOT like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, yeah, for sure. The marketing they did for Guardians was also very bad, it really made it seem of a kind with Avengers, which it really wasn't.

There will be a lot to say about why Rocksteady is getting to the looter shooter space so late and why it was the exact wrong move for the studio and the franchise. Unless the game is great and everybody buys it, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, big difference there, though. Suicide Squad actually IS a looter shooter driven by a wish to chase a business trend from five years to a decade ago. Guardians is a strictly single player Mass Effect-lite narrative action game (which yeah, given the material that fits).

I'd be with you in the argument that it would have been an even better game without the Marvel license, because then they could have skipped trying to rehash bits from the movies' look and feel, which are consistently the worst parts of the game. But then, without the license it would never have been made, so... make mine Marvel, I guess. Well worth it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›