Rob200

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Sprite rule.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

One of my top opennings for sure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Might actually, seems surprisingly active.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I didn't know about that specific community, as i'm posting from a different instance. Apologies on that. Yeah, there actually, a lot of Lucky Star specific videos on Peertube. From mashups, and more lyric videos.

 

Lucky Star Dance Lyrics in English (fan dubbed)- peertube no ads https://vid.northbound.online/w/tedSeFbwh95oWpLz8tsef9

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Like, I use to be able to search for animations, and there use to be a lot of new animation videos I could find, new uploads even. In like the last two years idk what happened, but that's my degradation issue i'm talking about.

 

I am aware of Sepia search however, when I first used Sepia search I use to be able to find all sorts of content. But now a days I can't find anything on that. But only some of the things. Is there a more reliable tool to search across Peertube instances for videos?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

This form however seems well thought out overall, because they have an 'other' and a prefer not to say choice. Anything they didn't specifically include is I guess technically is included, under the 'other' choice. Very vaguely.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, I mean sure it's good that they are showing they know those identities exist. But this info could be used for any purpose, imagine being asked this in Russia. The government 'could' potentially literally target you in a bad way knowing this about you.

In the u.s right now, another example, so it's one thing if they are representing these minorities, but it's another if they are collecting data about you. For who knows what purposes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

In the u.s, the main parties are the republicans and the democrats. 3rd parties don't receive much news coverage because, one or the other main parties, also dominate the news media in the u.s. Not many people know that there were attempts for a socialist party in the u.s, because the news will not cover them as much as they will cover "their hatred for trump."

average people in the u.s generally (they aren't people who study a lot of literature, just general people.) They even understand that both sides aren't perfect. They know.

the issue is.

When it comes to one political party vs the other, guess where people are going to always flock to. If it isn't one, it's the other, because to them, it's only that other one that might have a chance of making the change they want. 3rd party political parties have a hard time gaining traction.

 

Like to many people, the word freespeech might sound good, untill you run into hatespeech. While there isn't a widespread way to define this type of speech, I found a few terms that can help narrow things down. (speech that does not include hatespeech.)

  1. freespeech. Strictly protects you from 'government' censorship, however there may be limits. If not legally, then perhaps, you'l lose a few friends socially. Freespeech, is not always acceptable speech.

  2. responsible speech. Ok, so now we are at a term that helps to simplify things more toward the direction things are actually heading around the world lately. It's saying, make sure you are posting responsibly, and that your posts are not degrading nor attacking others. So, no to discriminatory and harmful language. Does it directly cover hatespeech? Not specifically, it's more so addressing the actual end result of the harm from user posts. Be responsible.

  3. Inclusive speech. Again, not directly addressing hatespeech, but rather indirectly. By asking for inclusive speech, it would vaguely, while not as specifically, just ask of you to keep your speech as inclusive. When referring to someones pronouns/gender, you'l want to be inclusive and not misgender, or miss pronounce a person in anyway.

Honestly, if you were to combine responsible speech and and responsible speech into a single term, combining their meaning you would actually have an actual singular term describing all this, (speech that does not include hatespeech.)

and what is expected socially. While both terms, do have some vagueness to them, combining them would still keep them vague. Having one term to describe expected social behavior would simplify any confusion from trolls or actual confused people.

While I and other might not think these things are confusing, too alot of people in the last decade+ these terms are new to them.

I'm not advocating for any changes, but I'm looking for some words that describe speech without the inclusion of hatespeech.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's one thing to Ubisoft, (or any company under capitalism) if it's just a small few fascist who are racist against their current character choices. But if Ubisoft is risking facing actual legislation in a major market, or a ban. They are going to respond, because they would loss a significant market. They don't want to lose an entire market where they can profit from.

In this case, it isn't really about minorities, is this a little authoritarian, possibly on Japans part, but really, Ubisoft needs this game to profit as best as possible, which is why it can't afford to lose a large market right now. With its low stocks of late, things aren't looking good for the company. They are at risk at being sold off at some point.

 

If you appreciate what brahaj has done, or have any comments on how this Lemmy instance shaped your Lemmy experience positively please leave your comments here.

I noticed how there has been some negatives geared towards how blahaj moderates, this even resulted in certain communities being "moved" to other instances and then recreated, on blahaj due to the community of users being against the decision.

if you have anything positive to say about Lemmy.blahaj.zone shaped your Lemmy experience even without being directly on the instance, this is a place to let people know.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Some more specific sources on games representing marginalized identities. A continuation on that list of games I showed you.

Splatoon 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW4V3sVdigU Hair style is no longer decided by gender, unlike in earlier entries of the game.

Spyro 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1V8HZPPoaI Spyro represents ace vibes in one part of the ending cutscenes for the game. For a PS1 game particularly this is important. After seeing Mario saving Peach in another castle for how many so times.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I have a few things, along with specific examples.

  1. There was a glad study on LGBTQ+ representation in games.

Studies indicate a significant presence of LGBTQ+ individuals within the gaming community. Notably, GLAAD's research, based on Nielsen surveys, highlights that a considerable percentage of active gamers identify as LGBTQ+. Specifically, the GLAAD report shows that 17% of active gamers are LGBTQ+.

  1. There is LGBTQ+ representation in games you probably wouldn't expect.

a. In Splatoon 3 on the Nintendo Switch, you have your inkling and Octoling avatars, but they are not gender locked meaning you can have voices of the opposite gender, despite the hair style. Could also be looked at as representing feminism.

b. In a Spyro 3 Year of the Dragon, Spyro the dragon originally released on the PS1, shows some asexual aspects when hunter and bianca kiss in an ending cutscene. Ace vibes. Tells Sparx to look away,

  1. Fan posts, allow marginialled queer and LGBTQ fans of a franchise to have their side represented, even if in an uncannon way. Very important for representation.
 

While a basket without a lid might work, with a lid, it adds an extra layer of protection for your cloths or even for anything you might want to try to preserve.

Lets say you have a house flood, or have an ant invasion, you'l want to have one of these. The basket itself doesn't need to be clear to see through, but might be beneficial if you are trying to save time for more important things.

47
Ruling up the hill (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

When you don't know what to do with a rule, rule it up a hill.

49
Rule, amirite? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 

Rules get broken sometimes. But not this time, I followed.

 

Do you know of any inclusive LGBTQ+ apps and software that anyone can use. Comment any that you know, the longer the list, the more helpful for LGBTQ identifying people.

When I say, or think of LGBTQ+ inclusive: I mean,

apps made by LGBTQ+ either made by some, or with a majority amount of the devs making it are LGBTQ+ identifying people, and that the final app/software itself is inclusive towards LGBTQ individuals.

Here is a few I know, others can add on any they know of in comments.

Mastodon, Lemmy, Peertube, which are pretty much inclusive to anyone. Notable examples, however with type of social media, it will vary on your specific interaction with users. The apps themselves though I feel are pretty inclusive, free of immediate cost. The content found on it can be a different story, so join a good server/community wherever use use the your socials today and in the future for a safe space.

 

Aromantic: means that an identifying person does not feel romantic attraction. Might not believe in romance, only everything else in between. Including, casual bonding activities. (Yeah, it's not all about.. you know.. nature doing its thing.)

Does that mean, no movies, no restaurants trips and etc? No actually: because an aromantic person may go to the movies, or anywhere with a friend or their family casually.

They can still go to a movie with their partner, or partners. without any romantic ideals, and it might still be considered just as a casual visit to the movies, or they might just casually go to a restaurant to eat some foods together.

It wouldn't be looked at as romantic to the aromantic person in the context. Now to the partner it may vary on how they perceive it but certainly both will see it as quality time together.

9
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The idea of a romantic attraction, while I don't judge others romantic attraction; I hadn't always been directly attached to romantic dates. As I was beginning to discover myself, I went from deciding on being a demi-sexual, to then realizing I was more of an aromantic type. I had been made fun at for not going on dates, but not everyone was arophobic towards me and meet some nice and accepting people, after coming out as aromantic publicly.

view more: ‹ prev next ›