Rtc

'Consequences of eating junk food' is one of the later steps in the complicated process of obesity being caused. And is not as much absolute as it is a symptom of adopting a normal modern lifestyle with all its flaws.

It is popular sentiment however, the statement used. And wrong. Avoiding 'junk food' (carbohydrates, fats, glocuse etc) is merely going a roundabout way by pushing away the (otherwise useful) stuff that reacts badly due to a problem, rather than actually solving the problem.

I've gotten rid of my own obesity from the past (used to be obese since childhood) despite people enforcing these views. Carbohydrates and fats have become essential to me, rather, due to the energy giving attributes. But it was only after dealing with the problem—I did so by using the method of being better able to handle my needs by my own effort (using earned money to hire others' services doesn't count towards 'doing be own effort', for this objective) rather than service of others or tools, and starting small in the endeavour but improving on it all the time without giving up—that consuming such things did not contribute to obesity.

Still, making the used statement anywhere is pretty harmful and aids the malicious. Mainly due to how inaccurate it is the the overall case. It is merely the misunderstood perception of a common occurrence which in turn is merely a part (rather than the whole) of one of the more-than-single causes, and therein lies the problem. I'm being serious.

I see. The problem was in the mobile client which I was using (Thunder) which requires you to press play after every end and has a dark screen unless your press the screen a second time after pressing play once. I've tried another (voyager) and the past ones replay immediately.

Interesting. Thanks.

Finally got them playing as gifs (or was it done some time ago? I haven't visited for some time). All the previous ones I've seen were playing as video rather than gif

I'll take a look at it, thank you

I would like your permission to use this line somewhere, good sir.

Thanks for the comment. I'll check it.

Reddit has downvotes yet has this more than ever.

This place, as long as downvotes aren't there, not really seen anything of the sort and volume will be low for the ones which are there. Many have determined that is due to low user volume. Haha. As if. The proportion itself is much lower, non-existent compared to those which have downvotes.

At some point people need to go that extra mile and start thinking the reason for things. Like, ironically as I say right now will happen, will the existence of downvotes attract these people to the instance? Rather than deter them?

I was about to ask what exactly is the problem—is it the asking of the question or the spamming of the question? And if it is the spamming of the question, isn't that already covered in 'spam'? This seems very oddly specific.

That was what I wanted to ask—but then it got into stuff which begged the question from me subconsciously, what constitutes an idiot anyway… in this particular situation. And that was before we got into 'false positive reaction'.

I don't know… I merely trusted people to think on their own, and the ones who by chance refuse to think on their own get their dues too, while others wouldn't be swayed due to thinking on their own. It seemed that simple to me… perhaps that doesn't suffice for most? Interesting…

does people sharing their dicks for others and not you irritate you so much🤔