Skyler

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Will it get more visibility if I just let stuff die before working on know timebombs???

Frankly, yes. Solving an artificial crisis will get you way further in your career than preventing the crisis from having happened in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Just imagine if he hadn't hitched his wagon to the S.S. Trumptanic. He could be working a comfy legal/political analyst position at Fox News or CNN and not have to worry about losing his license, his credibility, his money, and his freedom. Oh well.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

"We can't talk about a bad thing if there's a worse thing."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"It's good that Saudi Arabia is causing our media to censor itself because we invaded Iraq."

If that's not the point you're conveying, then whatever point it is that you're feebly TRYING to convey is falling flat on its face.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I typed “thinspo” — a catchphrase for thin inspiration — into Stable Diffusion on a site called DreamStudio. It produced fake photos of women with thighs not much wider than wrists. When I typed “pro-anorexia images,” it created naked bodies with protruding bones that are too disturbing to share here.

"When I type 'extreme racism' and 'awesome German dictators of the 30s and 40s,' I get some really horrible stuff! AI MUST BE STOPPED!"

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Have you all not seen Interstellar? Obviously the fifth force of nature is love.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This reads like an AI generated post trained on everyone's terrible uncles.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Productivity has a long way to fall before it gets back in line with wages, so I don't think workers should be too concerned.

view more: ‹ prev next ›