SwooshBakery624

joined 1 year ago
[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but they and the Tor Project are making enough changes that Mullvad Browser can be considered a hard fork rather than a soft fork.

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Not really. Mullvad Browser is a Tor Browser fork. WebLibre is a Gecko-engine based Flutter browser written from scratch.

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 44 points 3 months ago (19 children)
[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The developer refused to add lyrics support, supporting their point with a response from ChatGPT.

Maybe. Maybe not.

Chatgpt:

"He brings up some points that tap into how legal responsibility is often framed in terms of “user-provided content” in various platforms and tools. Let's break down the key legal and technical considerations involved in displaying user-supplied lyrics files in a music player app like Kew:

#188. Diabolical. The feature was added later anyway, but still.

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Their dataset being MIT Licensed is a good thing, thanks for pointing that out. Didn't think they would release it under a real OSS license. I guess contributing this way is a-okay, even though I would personally refer from giving FUTO any more attention.

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 46 points 3 months ago (9 children)

FUTO keyboard is a proprietary crap. You are contributing to Nazis pockets, not to open source.

view more: ‹ prev next ›