Teknevra

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Perhaps offer it as a setting, that users could potentially turn on/off?

It's just that, IMHO, there's no point in having Profile Images, if you're not allowed to zoom in /out, and see them up close.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

In Reddit, if, while scrolling through posts, you tap on a post that contains an image, and then swipe upwards, you are able to access the comment section, without having to click on the comment section button.

 

Seamless Navigation from Image Posts to Comments

Description:

When users on Lemmy tap on a post with an image on their mobile devices, it would significantly enhance the user experience if they could swipe upwards to directly navigate to the comments section of that post. This interaction would be similar to how Reddit handles navigation for image posts.

Benefits:

  1. Streamlined Navigation: Users can quickly move from viewing the image to reading and engaging with comments, creating a more fluid and interactive experience.
  2. User-Friendly Interface: This feature aligns with intuitive swipe gestures that are common in mobile apps, making Lemmy more accessible and user-friendly.
  3. Enhanced Engagement: By simplifying the path to comments, this feature encourages more users to participate in discussions, thereby fostering a more vibrant community.

Implementation Details:

  • Swipe Gesture: When a user is viewing an image post on mobile and swipes upwards, the app should transition smoothly to the comments section of the post.
  • Visual Cue: Optionally, a subtle visual cue (e.g., a small upward arrow at the bottom of the screen) could be added to indicate this swipe action.
  • Animation: The transition should be smooth and visually pleasing, minimizing any abrupt changes.

Impact on Existing Features:

This feature would complement existing navigation and post interaction methods without altering them, ensuring consistency across the app’s interface.

By incorporating this feature, Lemmy can improve its usability and create a more engaging experience for its users, aligning with the intuitive expectations set by other popular social media platforms.

 

Overview

I would like to propose adding an interactive user profile image feature to Voyager for Lemmy, enhancing the user experience when viewing other users' profiles.

Detailed Functionality

  1. Tappable Profile Image Section

    • When users tap on a username and navigate to the profile page, add a dedicated section for the profile image.
    • This section should be prominently displayed and easily accessible.
  2. Expandable Image View

    • Implement a feature allowing users to click/tap on the profile image to expand it to a larger view.
    • The expanded view should occupy a significant portion of the screen for better visibility.
  3. Mobile Zoom Functionality

    • On mobile devices, enable pinch-to-zoom functionality for the expanded profile image.
    • This allows users to examine profile pictures in greater detail.
  4. Desktop Zoom Controls

    • For desktop users, add a dedicated zoom control bar.
    • Include buttons or a slider for zooming in and out of the profile image.

User Experience Benefits

  • Improved user engagement with profile content
  • Enhanced ability to view and appreciate user avatars and profile pictures
  • Consistent functionality across mobile and desktop platforms

Implementation Considerations

  • Ensure smooth transitions when expanding/collapsing images
  • Optimize image loading to maintain performance
  • Consider privacy settings that might affect image visibility

I personally believe that this feature would significantly enhance user interaction and personalization within the Voyager for Lemmy platform.

Perhaps something like this:

(Source: Summit for Lemny)

14
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Teknevra@lemmy.world to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world
 

In the "Summit for Lemmy" app, if you go to a community that you moderate, click on the three dots in the bottom right corner:

then when the Community options pops up:

tap on "Community Info":

Which will give you the "Unsubscribe" / "Instance Info" options, as well as the community Header/Profile Image, Description, Stats, etc.

If you then tap the three dots in the bottom right corner, you end up with the option to edit /delete the community.

PLEASE add a feature similar to the Community Edit/Delete for Voyager.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Or perhaps a Federated Website, and then just link the website when you want to make the linkable list?

27
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Teknevra@lemmy.world to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world
 

In the "Thunder for Lemmy" app, when you share a Community/User/Comment, when you tap / click on the share button, a pop-up appears, asking you whether you wish to share via:

https,

via Community Link,

via Home Instance (if applicable),

share Post Image (if applicable),

share Post Media Link (if Applicable),

an Advanced Option (if Applicable),

(Advanced Sharing)

etc.

PLEASE PLEASE incorporate a similar feature into Voyager.

It would make sharing a hell of a lot easier.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I wonder if there could potentially be an instance called "Lemmy Religions Network", that is basically just an Instance for religious communities to be under?

That way, users who are specifically interested and looking for religious communities know what to look for.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Sure, I'll take it.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

For OpenChristian mainly.

Although, if it goes well, I might consider potentially attempting to expand it by bringing other subs like:

Christianity

Progressive_Islam,

DebateReligion

Jewish

or others

I have already done Queer_Muslims

@ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com

I wouldn't mind the extra help.

Which religion are you/looking for?

EDIT: OpenChristian is now up.

 

I have been attempting to help Reddit Subreddits migrate over to Lemmy, and so far, it has been pretty good.

But one of the of the Subreddits is Religion Based and when I went to JoinLemmy, and clicked on "Join a Server", there is no Religion option.

There is a Religion tab, and you can choose what language, but, after that, it just shows that there are no Religion based Servers, regardless of the language that is chosen.

EDIT: OpenChristian is now up.

 

Hello everyone,

Has anyone ever considered potentially building or launching a platform similar to the Internet Archive but using ActivityPub?

This could serve as a decentralized network to document, preserve, and protect online content from loss, censorship, and other threats, ensuring its availability for future generations.

For those unfamiliar, the Internet Archive is a non-profit that has been preserving digital media and promoting universal access to knowledge since 1996.

It’s famous for services like the Wayback Machine and Archive-It.

Given the importance of preserving digital heritage, especially in the context of censorship and data loss, a Fediverse-based equivalent could fill a crucial role.

The decentralized nature of ActivityPub could provide a robust alternative to centralized solutions.

I'd love to see this kind of project come to life, but, unfortunately, I lack the motivation, time, and energy to take it on alone.

Has anyone else ever considered something similar?

Are there any existing projects that might be interested in this direction?


Internet Archive Wikipedia

 

I've been exploring various Fediverse platforms and noticed we have alternatives for many popular social media sites:

  • Friendica (Facebook-like)
  • Pixelfed (Instagram-like)
  • Lemmy (Reddit-like)
  • Mastodon (Twitter-like)
  • etc.

But I'm curious: Is there a Fediverse equivalent to the classic MySpace, or its modern revival, Spacehey?

Spacehey Apple App Store

Spacehey Google Play Store

Spacehey Wikipedia

MySpace

MySpace Wikipedia

I'm talking about a platform that offers:

  • Highly customizable profiles
  • A focus on personal expression through layout and design
  • Music integration
  • The nostalgic feel of early 2000s social networking
  • etc.

Has anyone come across a project like this in the Fediverse? Or do you think there's potential for developing such a platform?

Alternatively, if that's too much work/hassle, has anyone ever considered reaching out to the SpaceHey team about the possibility of them potentially federating their platform? It could be an interesting addition to the Fediverse ecosystem.

There's been some talk about Spacehey Federation.

I'd love to hear your thoughts, experiences, or any leads on this topic.

 

I was wondering if there exists a platform similar to Downdetector or Down For Everyone Or Just Me (downforeveryoneorjustme.com), but specifically designed for the Fediverse and utilizing ActivityPub?

These platforms allow users to check if a website is down or if it's a personal connectivity issue.

is a tool that aggregates reports of outages across various services (e.g., internet, social media, streaming platforms) to help users determine if an issue is widespread or isolated.

is a simple service that checks if a website is down for everyone or just the person trying to access it.

If such a platform does not exist for the Fediverse, should we consider creating one?

It would be INCREDIBLY useful for monitoring instance(platform uptime and diagnosing connectivity issues within our community.

Unfortunately, I personally lack the time, energy, and motivation to initiate this project, but I believe it could be a valuable resource for all of us.

If anyone is interested in developing such a service, I personally believe that it could enhance our overall Fediverse experience EXPONENTIALLY.

 

This might just be me, but I’ve recently been wondering—has anyone ever floated the idea of potentially creating a decentralized and/or federated alternative to the browser engines dominating the market?

Right now, it feels like options are increasingly monopolized, with Google Chromium (Blink) being the backbone of almost every browser, and Mozilla’s Gecko engine fighting to hold on.

While platforms like Mastodon, Lemmy, and others prove that decentralization/federation can work remarkably well for social media, could this model apply to browser engines or even search platform ecosystems?

Maybe something open and community-driven that allows different stakeholders or communities to innovate independently while ensuring compatibility standards?

I recognize this would be a monumental challenge, requiring deep technical expertise, time, and resources.

I’d love to explore it myself, but I just don’t have the energy, time, or knowledge to get such a thing off the ground.

However, I’m hoping to hear if anyone has had similar thoughts, knows of any related projects in development, or has ideas about how this could work.

Imagine a world where browser developers aren’t forced to rely on Google’s Chromium, and instead, we could have a crowd-sourced federated system where each contributor could bring something unique to the table without centralized control.

Would this even be feasible?

What do you think?

Is it worth dreaming about, or are there insurmountable hurdles that make such an initiative unrealistic?

Looking forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts.

[–] Teknevra@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Doesn't the citizen app do that as well?

Wikipedia

 

Does anyone else feel like the Fediverse could potentially use a centralized, clear, and engaging way to introduce itself and its platforms to new users?

I’ve noticed a recurring trend: on Reddit, YouTube, and other platforms, there are constant questions like "What is the Fediverse?" or "How does Mastodon/Lemmy/Pixelfed work?"

While it’s great to see so much interest, these questions can become repetitive, and they highlight the need for a more accessible and official introduction to the Fediverse.

What I’m proposing is The FediGuide—a centralized, interactive, and approachable platform or website designed to explain what the Fediverse is, how ActivityPub works, and what its platforms (like Mastodon, Lemmy, Pixelfed, etc.) are all about. Here’s how The FediGuide could look and function:


Key Features of The FediGuide

1. Interactive, Child-Friendly Design

  • The FediGuide should be so simple and visually appealing that even a five-year-old could grasp the concepts. Think:

    • Bright visuals
    • Interactive animations
    • Step-by-step explanations
    • Simple, jargon-free language

    It should feel as welcoming as picking up a colorful amusement park brochure or summer camp guide.


2. Centralized Hub for Information

  • The FediGuide could serve as a one-stop resource for anyone curious about:

    • What the Fediverse is
    • The differences between Fediverse platforms (Mastodon, Lemmy, Pixelfed, etc.)
    • How to join and use these platforms
    • The concept of ActivityPub and why it matters
    • Comparisons to centralized platforms like Facebook/Reddit/Instagram
  • It could also include video tutorials, either normal Youtube/PeerTube videos, or ones similar to interactive training videos you see at workplaces for employees, infographics, and even community-generated FAQs to clarify common concerns.


3. Interactive Tutorial Platform

  • The FediGuide could take inspiration from onboarding tools like:

    • Guided tutorials that mimic real-world actions (e.g., "Here’s how you create your first post on Mastodon!")
    • Engaging quizzes like “Which Fediverse platform is right for you?”
  • For a truly immersive experience, it could be built as a fediverse-based platform itself, where users could "try out" ActivityPub principles in action.


4. A Fediverse-Based Clippy

  • Imagine a friendly, helpful virtual assistant (think Clippy from Microsoft Word) that pops up on different platforms to explain features and answer user questions. For example:

    • Someone joins Mastodon for the first time → the assistant helps them learn the interface and suggests accounts to follow.
    • The assistant could live on The FediGuide website but also integrate with Fediverse apps.

    This assistant could provide context-sensitive help and guide users toward relevant parts of the Fediverse.

Maybe name it Fred if it's a boy, and Fredi if it's a girl, or something similar.


5. Easy to Share and Reference

  • The FediGuide should be easy to reference and share, with:
    • A memorable name and URL (e.g., “www.TheFediGuide.org”)
    • Compatibility with multiple languages, ensuring accessibility for a global audience.
    • Integration within Fediverse platforms, where users can easily point others toward the resource.

Why This is Needed:

  1. The Learning Curve: While the Fediverse is an exciting decentralized alternative, its concepts can be intimidating or confusing for new users.
  2. Constant Repetition: People across various platforms keep asking the same questions, which suggests the need for an official, consistent source of answers.
  3. Community Growth: Making the Fediverse easier to understand will lower barriers to entry, helping it grow and thrive.

Potential Obstacles and Solutions

  • Obstacle: Many Fediverse projects are run by volunteers with limited resources.

    • Solution: The community could work together to crowdsource the content and development of The FediGuide. Alternatively, organizations backing the Fediverse (e.g., Mastodon gGmbH, Pixelfed, etc.) could potentially allocate resources to this idea.
  • Obstacle: Ensuring the information remains up-to-date as platforms evolve.

    • Solution: Treat The FediGuide as an open-source project, with regular contributions and updates from the community.

Potential Next Steps'

If this idea resonates, here’s how something like this might potentially move forward:

  1. Gather Feedback: Discuss what features or content would be most helpful. Would a website, platform, or both work best? How simple/interactive should it be?
  2. Identify Developers & Contributors: Call for volunteers or organizations in the Fediverse ecosystem to support this idea.
  3. Choose a Platform: Decide whether The FediGuide will be a standalone website, an ActivityPub-based app, or both.
  4. Launch in Phases: Start with a basic explainer website, then add interactive features like tutorials, a Clippy-style assistant, or even gamified learning modules.

What do you all think?

Does The FediGuide feel like a useful addition to the Fediverse?

I would consider doing something like this, but, unfortunately, I do not have the time, energy, or knowledge.

 

Consider creating and sharing video updates about the development progress of Loops and Pixelfed on popular social media platforms like YouTube, Twitch, TikTok, etc.


Rationale:

  1. Increased visibility: Platforms like YouTube and TikTok have MASSIVE user bases, providing an opportunity to reach potential new users who may not be familiar with Loops or Pixelfed.

  2. Engaging content format: Video content is highly engaging and can effectively showcase new features, UI improvements, and behind-the-scenes development processes.

  3. Building community: Regular updates can help foster a sense of community and excitement among existing users, keeping them informed and involved in the project's progress.

  4. Inspiration from others: Some developers are already using this approach successfully. For example:


These creators are effectively using TikTok to document their development journey and build interest in their projects.

By adopting a similar strategy, Loops and Pixelfed could:

  • Provide regular progress updates to the community
  • Showcase new features and improvements
  • Offer sneak peeks of upcoming developments
  • Share insights into the development process
  • Engage with users through comments and feedback

I personally believe that this approach could SIGNIFICANTLY boost awareness of Loops and Pixelfed while keeping the existing community engaged and excited about the project's future.

22
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Teknevra@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
 

I've been thinking about how we could potentially enhance the Lemmy experience, and I wonder if anyone else sees potential in incorporating a feature similar to Bluesky's Custom Feeds or Mastodon's Fedialgo?


Here's my thought process:

Why Custom Feeds?

User Empowerment: Custom feeds allow users to tailor their experience, moving beyond the limitations of chronological or "popular" sorting.

Discovery: They can help users find content and communities they might not encounter otherwise.

Flexibility: Users could create feeds based on specific interests, keywords, or even complex criteria.

New User Onboarding: Many new users join Lemmy from algorithm-driven platforms like Xitter, Reddit, Tiktok, Instagram, Bluesky, etc. and may find the manual nature of Lemmy's current feed system limiting. Custom feeds could help to smooth that transition.


Bluesky's Approach

Bluesky's implementation of Custom Feeds is particularly interesting:

Users can create and share their own algorithm-driven feeds

It promotes algorithmic transparency and user choice

The feature has been well-received for its innovative approach to content curation

https://bsky.social/about/blog/7-27-2023-custom-feeds

https://bsky.social/about/blog/3-30-2023-algorithmic-choice

https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/26/23739174/bluesky-custom-feeds-algorithms-twitter-alternative


Mastodon's Fedialgo

Alternatively, we could look at Fedialgo, which:

Allows for custom feed creation within the Mastodon ecosystem

Is open-source and federated, aligning well with Lemmy's principles

https://github.com/ronilaukkarinen/fedialgo


Potential Implementation for Lemmy

User-Created Algorithms: Allow users to define their own feed algorithms using a simple interface.

Shareable Feeds: Enable users to share their custom feeds, fostering community curation.

Integration with Lemmy's Existing Features: Ensure the custom feeds work well with Lemmy's communities and cross-instance functionality.

Open-Source Approach: Keep the feature open-source and possibly federated, in line with Lemmy's ethos.


I, unfortunately, do not have the time, energy, or knowledge to be able to attempt something like this.


What do you all think?

Could this be a valuable addition to Lemmy?

I'd love to hear your thoughts, concerns, or ideas for potential implementation.

view more: next ›