X_Cli

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Well, that's not entirely wrong: the website owner is responsible for contracting with Cloudflare in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It is probably just a question of price per unit. Adding a button would increase the cost drastically. If you want security, you just don't go with a RFID tag. You go with a smartcard protected by a PIN. Security-minded people are not the market segment for RFID tags. And if people are forced to use a RFID tag in a security context, they can protect the tag with a shield.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

You can ask them in lemmy.ml/c/veganism We are open to people asking honest questions.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/343162

How many nails does that coffin need?

 

How many nails does that coffin need?

 

Wordpress being able to force push code updates looks a lot like a botnet to me. And I'm not talking about compromised instances. What could go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, I knew about that and I find this an excellent feature! This is the reason why I'm asking about the "by default" behavior and not about "disabling score for everyone". I like that this is optional. I'm asking the community their thoughts about having scores hidden by default ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Maybe they just like link aggregators and the classification by communities? I don't use score-based sorting algorithms, precisely because I do not like how people vote on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I did not know that there are such options in Lemmy admin interface. That's very good! Thank you for the information

Edit: According to the admin documentation, one can indeed disable downvotes but I don't think one can hide scores for all users by default.

I checked and you are correct about beehaw. Thank you for the pointer. I'll probably subscribe to their communities :)

12
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Lemmy implements a scoring system allowing people to upvote or downvote posts. You know that since you are using Lemmy :)

Score can be used to increase or lower visibility of posts, in particular when using some sorting algorithms (active, hot, top).

This can be used to increase the visibility of good quality posts, and lower that of low quality or irrelevant posts.

Yet, from what I observe, the tool is mostly used for communities to self-administer filter bubble. Some communities seem to behave like a hive mind, massively upvoting or downvoting until either the dissident is assimilated in a very Borg way, or excommunicated.

Also, scores seem to be used often to convey cheap moral judgement, without having the need to expose oneself to criticism by providing arguments to sustain their opinion.

Overall, I think scores are more toxic than useful, and I would be in favor of hiding them by default, so that new comers are not put out by them.

What is your opinion about this? What are the advantages of having the score visible by default?

Just a clarification: the question is not "should scores exist or not?". If people find value in scores, good for them. I'm not one to dictate other people preferences. :)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Again, very good argumentation. Thank you. Your comments are much appreciated.

Some people may say “having access to candy crush has made me happier” but what’s actually increased there happiness isn’t access to a video game but distraction from the world around them as an example. That can be accomplished through several means and none of them require exposing oneself to potential manipulation for profit by a company.

That particular argument gives me much to think about. 👍

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The world is objectively worse because of free to play video games.

That was not my argument. I did not say it was all pink and that nobody suffered from f2p. I talked about the overall happiness. The same utilitarian approach can be used when talking about vaccines. Some people die because they took a vaccine shot. However the overall population is better because of the vaccine.

I'm not saying that f2p games are comparable to vaccine. I'm just trying to make clear that my argument is utilitarian, and that I'm not disregarding people having issues because of f2p games.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I respect your argumentation, but I believe you slightly twisted mine. By "people with income", I wanted to say "people with enough income to spend some on recreational activities".

Concerning the "insane potential for returns", I'm sorry to say that the company that I worked for and for which I developed a f2p game was a small company of 5 employees that never took off all that much. It is a business model. It is not a miraculous business model.

by your assessment its fine to exploit people for profit if they have an income

That's the basic concept of a salary. I would agree that there are unfair salaries, sure. That's when we can start talking about exploitation. I'm ok with salaries. I'm not ok with exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for your answer.

Diablo Immor(t)al is a pretty terrible case when it comes to trying to squeeze as much money as possible from people. We, players, are harassed by the notifications for paying features. And it is not just a "pay to skip"/"pay to fast" system: it is also a pay to win game for the competitive scene. That's bad.

On the other hand, it has at least 120 hours of free content...

My arguments are not in defense of Diablo Immor(t)al, though. They are in defense of Free to play in general, with reserves.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I don't get the downvotes on this message. I can understand why the other posts might be NOK for some people, but this one? Please explain it to me.

Artists need an income. Are we all in an agreement on this? You would not ask for a musician to play a full concert every night for free, right? Why would it be fair to ask a developer to develop a game for free? Do they not deserve a salary? And where would the money come from if not from people having money to spend on games?

12
Useless Use Of dd (www.vidarholen.net)
 

2022, people still use and make new implementations of OpenPGP. In 2015, I was already describing OpenPGP as a horror show for cryptographers. People need to move on! The format is wrong. The implementations are wrong. The mandatory ciphers are outdated. The web of trust is mostly dead since the key servers are broken.

view more: next ›