a_gee_dizzle

joined 4 months ago
[–] a_gee_dizzle 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

A great local author and publishing company has a great book on property taxes, called You’ll Pay For This. Well, it’s not about property taxes per se but its about how poor city planning + urban sprawl is stretching our resources thinner and thinner, inevitably leading to debt and higher property taxes. It’s a very illuminating read. Our current trajectory is not sustainable. I recommend this book to anyone I can lol

[–] a_gee_dizzle 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I agree that laws that you can’t enforce sort of just clutter up our legal system. And there are some contexts where this law would be hard to enforce, specifically when it comes to online shopping. In that context people won’t see how much other people are getting charged, so they may not realize that algorithmic pricing is at play. And it’s hard to enforce a law violation when no one knows that it’s going on.

But when it comes to shopping in person, this law would be easier to enforce, since in that context it would depend on people downloading an app to “see” prices. And that seems like something that is very easy to spot and prevent. So at the very least this law will be effective at preventing algorithmic pricing from creeping into physical stores.

[–] a_gee_dizzle 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Hard to say. I think there is strong public opposition to this practice though, so if there it occurs I think the chance of it being reported is pretty high. There is of course more follow up work that needs to be done after that, but thats still promising

[–] a_gee_dizzle 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

He is very cool. Have you seen his old rap videos? The conservatives tried to publicize this during the election here to make him look bad, but it backfired because it just made him look based af

[–] a_gee_dizzle 2 points 13 hours ago

I wonder if this would mean that Uber and Lyft will need to change how they charge people in Manitoba. I think you could make a case that its not the same though, because basing price based off availability of drivers is not necessarily the same as using personal data about a user to tailor the price to them specifically. In the first case it applies to everyone using the service at that time, in the second case it still varies person to person

 

For those unaware: algorithmic pricing is the practice of using data about a user to change how much to charge them. For example if a company buys your data and realizes that you just got paid, or that you’re that you’re really desperate for whatever product, or whatever, then they will charge you more. Usually this is done by a company requiring you to download an app so that you can “see” the prices, though it can be done more inconspicuously with online shopping.

This practice is becoming common in some areas. So its good to hear that Manitoba will be the first jurisdiction in Canada to outlaw the practice.

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago

You’re so literal-minded it hurts

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What did I say was wrong? Were the Uyghurs included in this poll or not? (Note that not every sampling bias is evidence of a communist plot)

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Oh you’re just fucking exhausting aren’t you

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Sure thing bud. Maybe for your next objective reality-based poll you could poll some Uyghurs

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago (8 children)

No, I just inferred you were a tankie by your lemmy.ml account and your defense of China

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Like Ive said numerous times before, I don’t care if the system meets your standards of purity. All I care about is if the election was democratic enough to hold the American people responsible. And that doesn’t even seem to be something you are disagreeing with at this point. You’re just getting your panties in a twist because “America” and “democracy” seems to be some sort of tankie trigger word for you

[–] a_gee_dizzle 0 points 2 days ago (12 children)

You seem to be confusing “being able to vote for Trump” with “the system being democratic.”

Well, that makes it democratic enough for them to have not voted for Trump and, like I’ve said repeatedly, that’s all that matters in this context

 

For me, its skating on the river trail

 

I’m not sure if this is the wrong place to post this; my apologies if it’s not.

Anyway, I have an inquiry about Mastodon replies seeming to not post to show up on Lemmy.

Earlier today I made a post on Mastodon and made it post to Lemmy as well, by @ing the community I wanted it to appear in. Here’s a link to the post on Mastodon, and here’s how it showed up on Lemmy. At first, everything seemed to work fine.

But something I noticed is that, though the Lemmy comments were visible to me on Mastodon, the reverse was not true: most of the Mastodon replies were not visible on Lemmy. So there seems to have been some federation issues there.

So my question is, does anyone know what caused this and if so how I can fix it?

 

Wab Kinew now seems open to moving to a consistent year-round time, abolishing the need for us to change the clocks twice a year. This seems to be a bit of a backtrack since he was interviewed on CBC Radio One and said that his government didn't have time for this since they were too busy focusing on affordability and healthcare.

Unlike BC, which is keeping with permanent daylight time, the NDP gov is open to keeping permanent daylight savings time. This is because there are a lot of health benefits associated with the extra hour of sunshine in the morning, though this comes with the tradeoff of having less sun in the evening when more likely to be out and about. But nothing is set in stone yet. Surveys with the public are ongoing.

 

Riverview, the Minnesota-based agricultural company that made the statement, is set to test the goal as it adds to its network of mega dairies by building two facilities along the North Dakotan stretch of the Red River before it flows north into Canada. One barn, near Hillsboro, will contain 25,000 head of cattle; the other, outside Abercrombie, will house 12,500. Together, the two will contain nearly the same number of producing dairy cows as the entire province of Manitoba (and will more than quadruple North Dakota’s quantity).

Sounds theres gonna be a lot of cows and the plans for cleaning up all the cow poop are a but shoddy. So there will probably be a lot of run off into the river, which will then flow into lake Winnipeg. This might make the water in lake Winnipeg kind of nasty as it will literally fill the lake up with cow poop and other pollutants. Not the kind of water want to go swimming in

 

I'm not asking about the ethics of lying, or whether lawyers may be justified in lying. That is beside the point. I am just asking: hypothetically, would it be possible for a lawyer to have a successful career while never uttering so much as a white lie?

Like, let's say the lawyer had some sort of spell cast on them, so they could never lie. If someone were to ask them a question, they'd either need to find a way to avoid answering or answer honestly. Would it be possible for a lawyer in such circumstances to still go on and have a successful career?

 

This is a bit last minute, but if you have any opinions on the provincial budget that you’d like to show, then now is your time to shine. Because the government of Manitoba has a survey put to gather feedback, and it’s open until March 12th

view more: next ›