Yes it is. Although I personally have far less moral objections to it.
To elaborate:
OpenAI scraped data without permission, and then makes money from it.
Deepseek then used that data (even paid openai for it), trained a model on that data, and then releases that model for anyone to use.
While it's still making use of "stolen data" (that's a whole semantics discussion I won't get into right now), I find it far more noble than the former.
Thank you for your insightful comment, it tells me a lot. Mostly about you, but still.
I only know the guy from the thumbnails and dead eyes. But this really feels like reaching for a justification to hate.
If you've seen (also past tense) any movie by, for example, Bryan Singer, you have consumed art made by a pedophile.
I'm not defending him (I honestly don't care about him), all I'm saying is that without any context, these kind of statements are kinda cheap and meaningless.
Ackshually, Big Ben is the name of the bell inside. This is a picture of the Elizabeth Tower.
My first guess would be "Oh, like the calendar?". Not the trek character.
“We had to get in on the video action, too — "
No, you didn't.
I'd say that federation is the core principle of the network, so centralisation by piling all the users and content onto one server is very undesirable.
(also looking at you, lemmy.world)
uh huh-huh.
Because triggered and hate circlejerk.
It's called butter. You know what happened.
(despite that, it did pretty rapidly remind me why I stopped using it - so much outrage for the sake of outrage)
So... How can you possibly justify that start button?