alabasterhotdog

Yeah, the DNC sure picked the candidate that this Canadian would've voted for. Do go on with your simplistic takes, tho.

I don't think the comment you're replying to is particularly off-base. Coming from a centre-left perspective, this government has been essentially inactive on so many issues that are negatively impacting Canadians, whether it be housing (pre-emptive frig off to the inevitable comments parroting the "provincial responsibility pablum), grocery prices, etc. I don't know anyone who thinks this term has been a success, and at this point even a substantial chunk of the Liberal caucus is concerned about going into the election with Trudeau at the helm.

You're at least consistent with your agenda-posting, I'll give you that, OP.

Thank you for saving folks from having to click a link blatantly posted by a marketing department.

Sure, either that or shifting public opinion. But sure, let's go with the conspiracy first.

Considering that she's only been back for a few weeks, that's rough.

I'm feeling strangely torn about the whole Truth-JD angle; on one hand, as dangerous as comedy can be in being a drag on credibility, I'm enjoying the lighter side to the JD, esp watching Priest trying not to crack. On the other hand, the actual character of R-Truth kind of makes me uncomfortable, there just seems to be certain undertones there that, intentional or not (and I really don't think they are), just has a "US film from the 30's or 40's" vibe that I can't shake.

You've proved with that comment that you don't really know what you're talking about. Belt and Road initiative?

While I acknowledge my tribal chief, the less he works the more I'd like to see the title on someone else.

There may be many factors but to just throw your hands up and say every issue is equally important is just plain foolish.

Cool, when you've gone ahead and created that mythical perfect world, let us know. Useful idiots sure love making the perfect the enemy of the good.