alphonse

If there weer to be an 'about us' section to explain what the project is and where it came from, that would let people understand that you are not trying to impersonate the 'creators'.

Perhaps including reto in the network section would be a sign of good faith.

Generally I believe reproducible binaries should be the standard method.

It's interesting that you mention ofrnxmr. I've noticed a lot of community members having a very negative experience with him.

Can someone explain what is going on, or link to something? This all seems sketchy, almost like a hijacking of the project, but I'm guessing not as there is talk of a CCS.

Also, why is the only network listed aloha? why not reto, which tbh thought was the only one.

A very sad day indeed

sounds interesting, thanks

Don’t use Signal, use Session

If you dont mean to promote one project over another, then i would suggest being more careful with what you write.

Thanks for the brief elaboration

please explain how session is different, because from my limited understanding, if you want to contact someone you need some kind of reference or 'ID'

why also do you differentiate 'trust in servers' from what you do in session?

to me, you're using a bunch of buzz words and phrases that have no real technical grounding. if i'm wrong please elaborate

if you're going to promote a service you should be offering up that information freely, otherwise no one will take you seriously. DYOR doesnt work in this scenario because its your initiative. this is aimed at you and @[email protected]

at 15 min it was so good, pure gold

saw your stickers on the day, nice work

it will balance out

Well i guess you could argue that there is the 'Third-Party Apps & Services Update' in the periodical #4. I was thinking along those lines. It's been said before, 'many people are unknowingly taking part in the counter economy', maybe some links to articles or things that may open up their mind to idea that the counter economy is and can be an organized movement.