ayawnymouse

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, however it wasn't doing that "intentionally" (to the degree that a bunch of matrix math has intent) - I think it's pretty clear that the missing leg and the extra knees are the same category, the same one as extra fingers and clothing parts that just taper in and out of existence, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's nice that these systems are not ablest. /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Amazing. Super realistic, I totally would have been fooled without the context.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nice!

First issue I see - at least on my browser (Kiwi, chromium based. On Android), usernames are not showing on the feed view - they do when opening a post or in the ellipse menu for a post on the feed. I tried both light and dark modes, and tried clearing cache.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

"Can you let me have some fun this time?"

"Hmph, at this speed? Too slow!"

" ...I've got a raid to get to — let's finish this."

"Nice, let's do it again when you're leveled up."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I'd recommend editing the title to mention that there's more than just the first pic.

Anyway, nice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tits, face, feet, pussy, butt (not hole) for me, but everyone will have their own preferences and order.

I get why you are using the mask, I just wish the world was different so you didn't feel the need.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Extra padded bra

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

If I didn't see where this was posted I wouldn't have noticed it was AI. Very nice

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Missing link?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I get the reasoning, but I do feel that the rules are Way too strict on artwork (as opposed to pics/video of real people) to an unprecedented level. I'd like to see that reevaluated to be more in line with what other sites that allow NSFW permit - if they were facing legal trouble over that content, then they would ban it too, so I think it's pretty evident that they don't.

In particular this whole concept of establishing a "canon age" for every character and disallowing aged-up art strikes me as much worse than simply disallowing any art that looks underage.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure that's only possible instance-wide (like on beehaw)

And I vote strongly against disabling downvotes on this instance.

view more: ‹ prev next ›