breakfastmtn

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Nah you were appropriately smart mouthed. The problem was my clumsy post intro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think there's any evidence of a global compromise but I think you're right that China wouldn't allow access if it didn't ultimately control it.

I couldn't find anything specific about iMessage but the keys are backed up to iCloud -- and we know that's compromised. I can't imagine them leaving users the option to just not back up to iCloud to avoid surveillance, but I haven't seen any specifics. Best to assume that under no circumstances do you ever have privacy from the gov't in China or even when messaging someone in China.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is heartbreaking news!

I do think that Firefish is gonna take off in a way that Misskey never did (even though it's huge in Japan). Hope you change your mind :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Apple proactively aids in censorship and stores all customer data, including encryption keys, on servers controlled by the Chinese government. They've also excluded security features from China and crippled existing features to aid government repression.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

They could have factories in China and not sell phones there. There are also other places to build factories. They just might have to trim back their 42% profit margin. It's still a willingness to abandon principles for a price, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean, they didn't cave to Russia either. Apple just has principles until there's enough cash on the table. Then they claim to "always abide by local laws" wherever they operate.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Don't you know anything, Brits? Apple only strips security features for the Chinese government, you fools!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Love it!

Added bonus: people won't think they're being invited to quickbooks.social anymore ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Me too! And stoked to see if they actually make calckey.social magically transform into whatever [newthing].social is!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I used firefox and didn't have a problem. I'd double check that you grabbed the JSON archive from IG. You should contact Dansup though because it should be working. I think there might be "contact admin" link on the upload page.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I think it just comes down to what you said: do you really want an experience like IG? If you're a hard no, it's probably not for you. I was kind of in the same place as you re: IG. Looking at my IG feed it's about 50% recommended and promoted. So half my feed is what Meta wants me to see. It sucks now and I was over it. But a version of that without ads or algorithms is honestly pretty great -- and I was skeptical of that until I tried it. I mean, IG has higher engagement than any network except TikTok, so it's a format that people seem to like. They just hate the Meta part :)

I don't think it takes away from Mastodon at all though. Like, I'm using Calckey which is very similar to Masto (and being renamed in literally 40 minutes) and it's not harming the community at all. I think Pixelfed will probably be the thing that makes people realize how powerful the Fediverse is. To most people, being able to communicate between, say, Masto and Misskey probably just seems like having different clients. But the idea that you could communicate with all of Facebook and Twitter from an IG account is kind of mindblowing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Have you contacted your admin? It should be working. I imported like 800 photos from IG on pixelfed.social a few days ago.

view more: ‹ prev next ›