I love this approach.
Nit: "If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner." ... 2013 is a typo I'm guessing?
I love this approach.
Nit: "If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner." ... 2013 is a typo I'm guessing?
I want to say this kindly--perhaps you're joking or part joking when you say "people suck in general"--but I wonder if this is more of a reflection of your outlook than people in general. I mean, we're internet strangers so I'm not exactly insulted by being one of the people out here who suck in general, but I'd like to think that if we crossed the chasm, and actually got to know each other, we'd see humanity and goodness in each other (without diminishing the reality of individual weaknesses, poor skills, and bad habits).
Cool, let's keep each other posted. You keep me off Reddit, and I'll tell you what I hear from Nirav :)
Fedora seriously impressed me when I tried it out. It was by far the most polished and stable OS I'd seen after a string of distrohopping beauties-lacking-substance for daily driving. Good choice!
I'm sorry for your suffering and heartache. I wish you the best.
I've been running Pop!_OS 22.04 and more recently the 24.04 build with the new (alpha) Cosmic Desktop Environment. It's been wonderful to use--solid hardware, solid OS. For 3 years I built a company called Relm (a 3D world with video and audio, similar to gather town) and failed at the business, but it was the 13" Framework laptop that gave me a sense of freedom, ownership, and confidence that I could replace parts if needed, as I built the business and codebase.
Great questions! I hope I can jump in without being too short.
I wonder if something like debatemap.app or kialo-edu.com would offer a better UX ("user experience") than Lemmy. I've also heard that substack.com has done a good job of attracting high-quality discussion (but I worry, what's stopping them from traveling down the enshittification path like all the rest?)
OTOH, I think online discussion itself has some weaknesses that can't be easily overcome--perhaps in-person, local discussion is (usually/almost always?) better. For example, one study indicates that engaging in political discourse with people online leads to an "uncivil comment rate" of 10%, while a "mixed political / non-political" discourse has a lower uncivil comment rate [1].
Personally, I find it to be generally true that I need to trust someone in one or more non-controversial areas of life before I take their controversial (to me) opinions seriously. Simple time and familiarity also helps.
[1] https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.741605/full
This is almost completely true, but I would add the caveat that PWAs (progressive web apps) are not as easy to discover and less familiar to install as an app in an app/play store. It might also be because it's in Apple and Google's best interest to not streamline that. But it's still an obstacle nevertheless.
What would a good incentive structure look like? For example, would working with public school districts and being paid by them to ensure safe learning experiences count? Or are you thinking of something else?
I wonder if some of our intelligence is artificial. Being able to drive directly to any destination, for example, with a simple cell-phone lookup. Reading lifetimes worth of experience in books that doesn't naturally come at birth. Learning incredibly complex languages that are inherited not by genes, but by environment--and, depending on the language, being able to distinguish different colors.
Mint is a great OS. I love its simplicty.