Your take is incorrect.
frayedpickles
Wat?
Ohh I see, you don't know how to read. This makes way more sense. Try again.
I am deeply amused that your reading comprehension was so wrong a random stranger downvoted you in my defense. ❤️ To whoever that was.
And why do you see deliberately throwing trash on the ground as being analogous to leaving the cart near where it was needed, and will be needed again?
Ermmmmm?
Wow that's solid condescension. What would probably help though is if you made it more clear that you think you're superior to the other poster. Maybe you could say "don't worry, you'll get there"? Or perhaps "we've all been there, I'm sure you'll be fine when you grow up"?
Why do you think those are analogous? You're telling me you genuinely believe that running a red light is analogous to putting a shopping cart in the wrong place? If you seriously think this: you're deranged and need help.
Can you explain why you believe this analogy is valid? I don't think you can, but I'd absolutely love to see you try.
What about what I said was strong? I don't think you know what strong opinions are.
Besides now im just messing with all the dumb fuckers, and I will always make time to mess with people who have weird fetishes they insist on forcing on other people. Like furries.
Just kidding I don't have any personal probs with furries.
What dont ones kinks have to do with shopping?
You're really weird
The input energy doesnt matter that much. Nobody is going to use 1980s laser tech to power a real reactor. As with OP, inertial confinement is interested in very small nuanced science aspects, not making a power plant.