hrosts

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

If you think you can just dump on me a bunch of articles and leave me to piece together what your argument might be or not be, you're wrong.

You said Ukraine is/was doing a genocide. You did not provide any evidence, while ignoring that cries of "national integrity" and "national security" are barely something more than legitimization mechanism for imperialist conflicts and has been such since imperialism existed.

You said Russia is not imperialist, or that Russian invasion is not imperialist, and chose to ignore my actual stated argument.

The Nazis - please make a statement I can argue with.

successful communist states

It's either an oxymoron, or you're begging the question. Also no argument again.

Don't be a lazy fuck and actually argue.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (9 children)

I am far from equating. Liberation of Ukrainian people must culminate in the destruction of the Ukrainian state, be it western- or Russian-backed, as is the case for all other peoples and states.

On the other hand, destruction of only Ukraine serves only their imperialist oppressor - Russia.

It's so funny when a liberal crying about "western values" is lecturing me on what constitutes idiocy.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (6 children)

"Everyone is getting called a Nazi these days, the word has lost all meaning".

Sure...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (11 children)

I agree. Ukraine shouldn't do this.

The OP's insinuation, however was not :

Ukraine is doing bad, it should do good

But:

Ukraine is doing bad, it doesn't deserve support

When you go this route, you side with the oppressor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, I'm not from America. I'm one of those people who will suffer from its fall to fascism, living on the imperial periphery.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You are literally saying "let fascism come, I'm ready".

Not everyone is. Your personal fight means nothing against the most powerful state in the world. You need a popular movement to just have a chance. Otherwise it's just part suicidal doomerism part larp.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fascists do care about winning, that is why they pump so much money into being elected, as elections are one of the most frictionless paths to power. That's why they change the rules to make themselves more likely to be elected. That's why they try to disenfranchise people who would vote against them. A coup is a risky thing, which is why they take all paths to power which are available.

You fight the cancer with everything you have or you die.

The problem is, you don't have much. There isn't a robust labor movement in the US which could provide a front against fascism. Any small scale or individual struggle might help you personally and save lives, but it's not gonna stop the bus. At most it's gonna pull some of the people from it before it drives of the cliff.

If you want to fight the guys who're about to hijack the bus, you need time. As much time as possible to amass the response. Voting for shit burgers is just what gives you that sliver of it. This is the thing you keep doing to be able to keep going, not the saving grace.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I heard that V was a representation of an open palm with 5 fingers. And X is two palms

view more: ‹ prev next ›