humbletightband

I don't know, it's just an urge to interfere with the US politics in any way

Nope. Child abuse is fucking disgusting, immoral, and should not be encouraged. But the whole 'child pornography' thing is vague so it makes cases like this arise. This should be reformulated to not include just nudity and,in general, equated with a tape containing video of a crime

We don't currently have enough information to make a conclusive statement

But someone does and it's hilarious

I read it and it seems reasonable. Child pornography is not always children having sex, it also could be a photo of one's own child. I know at least one case that such a law was exploited by a government: https://www.imrussia.org/en/human-rights/3405-december-2021-the-ingush-case,-memorial-and-ovd-info,-yuri-dmitriev

~~PS: IDK who's Aaron Schwartz ~~

Edit: ah, yes JSTOR case. Fuck Elsevier.

PS2: look at Sartre and his mistress Simona support letter for legalizing pedophilia

Maybe he wanted to vote against Trump several times: both in the primary and main

While out of context I'd agree with the statement.

But in the context you are calling for executions

This is the genocide call as well. Crimea was under Russian control for over 10 years. People both in Russia and Ukraine receive passports on their 14th birthday. So you are calling to kill all crimeans between 14 and 24.

And no, if you think that they should've received their Ukrainian passport, you're still wrong. Ukraine set a massive bureaucratic wall that is easy on paper, but is hard in reality

No, it's a simple war propaganda

I lost all hope in humanity reading the Reddit comment section on this topic.

1. He sold his ass to Putin

2. NYT is a Russian propaganda

3. Russian soldier did not follow Geneva Convention so it was ok to execute him

4. Russians are violent pigs beyond saving. They should be exterminated.

Let me first address the accusations of me accusing you being emotional and whatever. We're having a respectful conversation I hadn't hoped to have it in the first place. I don't like your views, I may only sympathize with you. Thanks for that.

The hate you are talking about is not inherently inside Russia's population. This hate is channeled by propaganda. As with Georgians and Turks: there were periods where everyone hated them, now they are friends. Fingers crossed the same will happen with ukranians soon, but I lost any hope that it will be reciprocal. Still, it is and will remain for decades a problem for the world.

how and when will russia change from its current state?

The current state is perpetual but silent war that exists, but somewhere far from themselves. The government finds this state to be the most favorable to them, but it draws a line between the government and the economic elites. I'd give it five to twenty years to resolve. No more than Putin's lifespan, but also it should be resolved by the upcoming Third World War.

But the question itself contains a subtle implication. You think that Russia is a threat to the world or neighbors because how easy it starts the war with its neighbors and how violent its rhetoric. While I agree, I would also add to this the efficiency of Russian government, if by efficiency we define the government's capability to save and multiply the resources of the very rich. My biggest fear is that other countries will implement the similar approaches.

I follow these simple rules and encourage my colleagues to do so

1. If I'm just shuffling jsons, then yes, the code should be self documented. If it's not, the code should be rewritten.

2. If I implement some complex logic or algorithm, then the documentation should be written both to tests and in the code. Tests should be as dull as possible.

3. If I write multithreading, the start, interruption, end, and shared variables should be clearly indicated by all means that I have: comment, documentation, code clearness. Tests should be repeated and waits should not be over 50ms.