Snikket was quite easy to set up and the community is very helpful
Most policymakers fear being mocked by economists as not understanding what’s going on, as economists cloak their lobbying efforts in math and their sloppy thinking in boring tones. You can even see it in the way these economists frame their arguments to politicians, explaining away the anger that normal people feel about these commercial systems. “It is reasonable to ask why the beef cattle industry should be plagued with so many contentious issues that have persisted for so long,” wrote one economists in the opening chapter of the book on beef supply. “Much of the reason is attributable to the fact that the U.S. cattle and beef industry may well be the most complex set of markets in existence.” It’s all just so complex and ranchers can be so emotional.
Really feels like economics at this stage is the continuation of politics by different means. Pure lobbyism....
I think you still want people to have some freedom for non-essential activities that they can access through their own means.
Not an expert in the topic at all, but I believe that in the UBI trials that were run (in Europe?) still had the public healthcare and education system available.
I think UBI can support and make easier some form of social welfare. For instance, in the country I'm living at the moment, it has been made really difficult for people who have to rely on social welfare to access it. A variety of gates have been created in order to ensure that an applicant "really needs" access.
I believe that UBI would be a much more dignified way of delivering social welfare. However I'm thinking about it really as a progressive tax that starts in the negative and then increases with income, which might be different to what others mean by this.
Don't disagree with your comment regarding the incentives in the current economic setup... however I believe that at the current stage the regulators rather aim to protect the excesses rather than trying to curb them.
I think a UBI can sit in parallel with other initiatives. For instance you can have universal healthcare and education, while still having UBI.
I also think that just because an idea can be perverted, it doesn't mean that it has to be that way or that there is no positive sides to it.
I'm critical of UBI as a single, silver bullet. However, I do think that there is potential for it to play a role in creating more just societies.
I like universal service too. Is there a good read that discusses how it would work with food and housing? Both sectors are currently very much profit looking, so I'd be curious to learn how they would be transformed.
To get out of poverty, stop drowning people in taxes, allow a wide contractual freedom
How do you see this working to stop poverty? E.g. lowering taxes generally has reduced funding for public services needed by the poor. Contractual freedom works generally better for those who are in a better position to negotiate, i.e. those who are not poor.
If you have a bill to pay today, kids to feed today, to eat yourself today and are without cash, contractual freedom would drive you to slavery in a minute, wouldn't it?
eliminating millionaire subsidies.
I agree with this as a measure, however I can't see how it would level the playing field, given that the rich have been subsidised for decades. To level the playing field, you would need a strong inheritance tax for the top 1%, as well as mechanisms to reverse the re-distrubution to the top that we had going for 40 years.
Since I asked, I guess I should answer too:
We suffered from post-natal depression, which I can assure is no joke. This was pretty intense for at least six months (after which we went on a prolonged holiday to our family which caused a lot of relieve), however lingered for probably 2 years and even now had aftereffects.
We are both expats, so we didn't have family to support, which in retrospect I would say makes things a lot harder.
I think the relationship is now very focused on the kid and we have to make plans for time together, like @[email protected] said, which is sometimes difficult.
In terms of perspective on myself:
I rediscovered in my kid a lot of things about myself I simply forgot. Both, good and bad. It also provided me with an enormous amount of perspective on what is important and why. I believe that being a parent made me a lot more compassionate towards others and myself. I was, and probably still am, pretty involved in work, however any successes or frustrations at work are fully mediated by my kid simply wanting to play and hang out with me.
To me having kids has been the most intense of experiences. And without sounding like a cliche, I'd like to say that it is for sure the most rewarding one, no matter how difficult at times. I'd compare it to being totally in love and infatuated with a psychopath on a bad day, and literally hanging out on the beach (which we did today) on a good one :D
Hmm, maybe from general literature I'd pick Umberto Eco's The Prague Cemetary, for being funny and interesting with an end that let's your heart sink...
Or probably The god of small things by Arundhati Roy. The book is an absolute treat and Arundhati Roy is just great in general!
In politics, it would be easily Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman's Manufacturing Consent. A lot feels of the books argument feels like common sense, however what impressed me so much was the detailed outline and references that drove down the point of the book so well.
At the moment looking at a Dell Venue 11 Pro (7130). Anyone has any experience running linux on it?
I'm not quite buying this. First of all, most people are forced to use some bloated OS and software at work. This means they get used to certain apps and unless they have a specific interest in say Open Source, they won't look into alternatives. Schools, universities, etc. all get "sponsored" by big tech as well, leading to further market capture.
Secondly, things like Linux are presented by large corps as complicated, which simply isn't true but again, the large corp would have some credibility bonus.
In general, the computer industry is largely consolidated from a customer perspective to a number of large players that scare people actively away from open solutions. As with nearly everything, you cannot vote with your wallet, since the markets are heavily tilted towards large corporations.
Finally, what is "woke-sufficiency"?