Maybe edit the title so that people not reading the comments (and the article) are aware? π€
I guess it all depends on what you understand by compression. If you are OK with lossy compression then it can be a valid path to investigate. If, on the other hand, you need non destructive compression I doubt text can be very efficient given how much redundacy our languages have.
In the end, a compression algorithm is a map function from a huge space to a much smaller one that assumes that, because not all values in the original map are statistically equivalent (in the sense that some of them are not valid or not interesting at all) the mapping will work most of the time and will reduce the data you need to store the values.
For a extremely lossy algorithm I think a text description of the image would do OK, but it would mean that you don't care about the image detail at all. Meaning that if you describe an image like "a man in a horse in a sunny day", that's all you care about and you are OK with getting different images when they are rendered.
To sum up: compression is already mathematically defined no matter what method you use, and has its limits. You could argue that maybe we can find a new mathematic definition of another thing we may call compression, but I really doubt it given how well established is the information theory. π€·ββοΈ
Did you send the money? It would be nice to have him record new albums... πͺ
Makes sense. I've also given a try to the flags I mentioned in rustfmt and they are apparently just for the nightly build, which makes me think they are working on it, which is good news (at least for me).
Sometimes having too much freedom when it comes to organizing code can be worse, I guess. But in general I prefer it to, for example, C, which was so picky with the placements of things.
Thanks for the feedback π
That's more or less what I do. However I usually struggle with enum, traits, functions and structs inside the same group. So, for example, if I'm in the public group:
π€
So, hierarchichal top down, I guess. With main types before subordinate ones. Right?
Nah, we just need to create another humongous economic bubble and things will go back to normal... π§
Maybe that's a sign that it is not mature enough π
Intriguing. Reminded me of Nick Bostrom's essays on ethical implications regarding simulations and AI...
IINM, you shouldn't that because it would defeat the purpose of this browser, which is to maintain the same fingerprint for everybody.
π