Task failed successfully.
lemonflavoured
joined 2 years ago
Assuming that ends up being the case then it sounds like a good idea. I do wonder if it will lead to a generation or two of phones with utterly crap battery life though.
The problem is that I can imagine this message resonating with quite a lot of people, which maybe doesn't say much about my view of people, admittedly.
I feel like at some point this is going to lead to a very clunky ban on using AI for voices, which specifically exempts human impressionists.
There will be bad actors of all descriptions on all platforms. The key is how effectively they are dealt with. We'll see on that.
Cracking The Cryptic has a decent community, as might be expected from a channel that mainly solve sudokus and cryptic crosswords. Wirtual (a Trackmania streamer) seems to have a vaguely sane community as those sort of people go.
I've used it a bit. It's a somewhat meh cross between Instagram and Twitter, as expected.
Jail them for a couple of years for Contempt.
Backdoor in communication would also apply to them, meaning that their communication can also be hacked.
I doubt it, actually. There's nothing to stop a government legislating to ban consumer use of E2E encryption while still allowing it for banks or government communications, say.
There's an irony in the British government going on about this all the time, while at the same time fighting in court to prevent their WhatsApp messages being turned over to the Covind inquiry because of privacy concerns.
More generally, I think it's a symptom of governments not being at all as tech savvy as they like to think they are.
I'd be intrigued how enforcable that would be if someone actually took it to court.