The thing is that for medium to large companies it's probably less expensive to pay people a nominal fee for pictures than it would be to risk being sued by, say, Disney, Nintendo, WWE or Games Workshop (to use some famously litigious companies).
lemonflavoured
To me the obvious answer would be to pay people a small amount per photo for pictures of various things and then use that as training data.
No need to ban ICEs if no one is going make them head tapping gif
It's going to be Lee Anderson.
Not him, but I'm surprised he hasn't claimed it. The guy's name who was convicted was Barry George.
I'm imagining this is a Matt cartoon in the Daily Telegraph.
My theory is that it was some Balkan security service or a gang acting on their behalf.
He's not really suffered much personal consequence from this, and most likely won't, so of course he's continuing the grift any way he can. Fucking arsehole.
I'm using it a lot less.
The party system is too entrenched. The last time it changed was because of a combination of WW1, votes for women and David Lloyd George being a twat.
He's right, but it's not like the alternatives are any better, either for the party or for the US if they were to win.